It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
He walks in the Garden with Adam and Eve, he sits on a throne and we are made IN HIS IMAGE.
The angle I take with most of my criticisms is the one I was raised with, the idea that Bible, even the Old Testament, might as well have been coming directly out of the mouth of God.
How does discussing a book and its interpretation translate into being religious? I don't need to believe in Darth Vader to criticize his actions, the same goes for Yahweh - he's a character in a story.
but there are many passages and books that are gray areas when it comes to interpretation such as whether Hell or the Lake of Fire are to be taken literally.
So if any portion of the Bible is to be claimed as divinely inspired than God must be a fairly poor communicator or be purposefully trying to confuse us.
This is the sort of mindset that I'm opposed to. I understand that average Christians don't think like this and I'd like to think that in some small way I could make a difference to make sure that this never becomes the majority viewpoint.
couldn't one argue that if God is our father then we are seeing through a child's eyes?
Later on it became clear to me that the decisions had merit and he had our family's best interest at heart
and thus what we might see as really crappy parenting could in fact be for our benefit.
So, it is pretty obvious that any "lake of fire" would be figurative.
then it pretty much can't be a place in any literal sense.
Good, then all I would ask is that you choose your shots and aim carefully
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
In a sense yes, however the way I see it it's an adult child's eyes, the child has grown into an adult and now must make their own decisions. It seems, at least from the Bible, that God will intervene, usually with wrath, if we make the wrong decisions.
The God of the Old Testament reminds me very much of an overbearing and abusive Father while the modern Christian concepts of God seem almost deistic in nature. God has indeed softened as society has changed.
This argument would be solid except that God's decisions in the Bible are often murderous. While it might be excusable for a Father to be strict and to make tough decisions murdering your children is never a good idea no matter how rebellious they've become. This is another idea that works well with the kinder gentler God of most Christians but not with the God of the Bible.
I've heard this excuse before, the idea that we are not understanding God correctly. The issue should actually be the other way around. God needs to have a basic comprehension of empathy and be able to put himself in our shoes. According to the those who believe in a Trinity God does just that with Jesus but this is thousands of years after the supposed Flood and the first born of Egypt and the whole Job debacle. Why is it that God does not understand us? He created us didn't he and to those who take the Bible literally God had a far bigger hand in creating us than most Fathers have in creating their children. God seems baffled when his creations disobey even though he's the one who would have given them free will to begin with. Again it reminds me of a Father who continues to hound his children and exert control over them long after they've left the house and are on their own.
As I said in another thread when your children are leaving the house a good Father should not grab them and say, "You must obey everything I have taught you or else I would find you and I will punish you!" God not only does this but his punishment, if the Bible is taken seriously, is either eternal punishment as a soul or physical death.
Interesting point, but couldn't one contend that God does not respond in wrath, and has not since the changing of the covenant?
And if you go under the thinking that wages of sin are ultimately death then the consequences make sense.
Perhaps he's baffled on why we keep choosing the same self destructive paths when He's told us how things would be.
Explain the parable of the prodigal son? In that God doesn't say "I am going to punish you." but allows the child to go out and learn the lessons which he has said over and over-so that when the son finally returns he is welcomed with loving and forgiving arms.
4 “I tell you, my friends, do not be afraid of those who kill the body and after that can do no more. 5 But I will show you whom you should fear: Fear him who, after your body has been killed, has authority to throw you into hell. Yes, I tell you, fear him. - Luke 12:4-5
Those are just my thoughts- I will never claim to know every aspect of God, but I will try my best to answer with what I do think I know-and hope I don't represent poorly.
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
I suppose but according to many Christians there's still the threat of wrath in the here and now and also later on in Hell although these may very well merely be scare tactics of the church. The God of the Bible seems like an abusive Father rather than the loving God that most Christians today believe in... In the same way that the Old Testament God's barbarism reflects the moral precepts of the day today's liberal and loving God also reflects the morals of our modern society to an extent. There are some fundamentalists who still believe that things like Hurricane Katrina and the BP oil spill were done by God.
People will never truly know God's decisions. And Fundies are perhaps the easiest to exploit and say they know. I had a prof in Seminary once say that we often try to paint God in a box, or will easily use God as a means to defend something hateful we say. I believe God's Word is perfect-and human interpretation is not anywhere close sometimes.
Also with Katrina and the BP Oil-where disasters. One being Natural the other the cause of a flawed creation. To say God is hate and thus is punishing us in such a manner is lunacy. Blaiming such events on God because he hates homosexuals or is angry at us is fear mongering. Allow me to quote I John
Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love. - I John 4:8
People get things wrong, and sadly fellow Christians will use the Bible in a way when they fear something or someone they do not understand. God then becomes the Rod- to us.
The idea that the wages of sin is death is only morally tenable if the sins punished by death are actually crimes deserving of such harsh punishment. In the Old Testament something as simple as working on the Sabbath could get you the death penalty, why is working on the Sabbath a sin while something obvious like SLAVERY is entirely condoned by scripture? I mean look at the Ten Commandments, freedom of religion is a sin as is using God's name incorrectly... why are those in there instead of slavery, rape, etc? The problem is the broad nature of the term sin, not all sins are deserving of death. Does a woman truly deserve to be stoned for not being a virgin on her wedding night?
Christ does go on to say of the commandments there are two that should ultimately be followed: "Love and obey God with all your heart, strength.." etc. and the second to this being: "Love thy neighbor as thyself." In Matthew fifteen, he even chides the Pharisees about dietary laws and other nonsense that was the norm in Leviticus stating that it's not what goes in your mouth that makes you unclean but what comes out of it, as it reflects your heart and mind on a matter.
With the woman being stoned, I even believe God is clear on that topic when he stops an adulterous woman from being stoned to death. There is a change in the way God is meeting us- and so what he wants us to do is show the mercy and love he is showing us. This is the last "do-over" for lack of a better phrase. there will be no more floods, exiles, etc. We're exiled as is. sin=death. Love and belief= Life.
Again over simplyfing things.
As for rape- God does not condone rape. When it is mentioned in Dueteronomy- God punishes the rapist. When Jacob's daughter is raped I do believe that he and his sons go and destroy an entire town over it. Rape is never condoned.
Never.
Slavery is also cast out as Paul talks to Christians who owned slaves asking them to release them- Also slavery then is different of slavery now and the slavery of the 1800's. But, I could go on about manumission and slavery. In fact when Jesus brings about the notion of Jubilee ( a statement that ends up pissing folks off whom he is speaking to) it is noted that the freeing of slaves is listed in the whoel what should be happening now.
Why would an all knowing being be baffled? How is that even possible? The Bible claims he knows our thoughts... he should understand us then. We're not that complicated. And God's never told us anything. All we have to go on is the Bible and a bunch of other religious texts which have never been proved to be historically accurate or give morally sound advice. Even if we count out all other religious texts and focus just on the Bible it is still impossible to interpret, full of logical contradictions and moral absurdities and doesn't seem at all divine. A God who does not speak to his children cannot expect to disobey and if the best parenting he can give is an old tome full of contradictions than it is perfectly understandable that we humans would be confused about what God wants or whether he even exists.
Perhaps baffled is the wrong word. Perhaps a profound disappointment? I don't see Him perplexed in saying why do you do these things- more like exasperated and let down.
Jesus's parable is a good one indeed. At times it seems like the God Jesus believes in is a far kinder and gentler deity than the tyrant of the Old Testament. Indeed the New Testament God is far nicer, so merciful that he is equated with Love itself. Paul says God is love and later on says that love is not jealous, this seems in direct opposition to the God of the Old Testament who repeatedly identifies himself as a jealous God and even says his name IS Jealous at one point.
There's also this verse where Jesus gives a more Old Testament image of God:
4 “I tell you, my friends, do not be afraid of those who kill the body and after that can do no more. 5 But I will show you whom you should fear: Fear him who, after your body has been killed, has authority to throw you into hell. Yes, I tell you, fear him. - Luke 12:4-5
I think God will always be jealous because he loves so fiercely. And that to do such a thing as throw one's soul into hell is not a petty thing to do, like discarding a broken toy. But, something that truly and deeply hurts Him.
I'd say you've done a good job, it's been an interesting discussion thus far
Thank you. I have enjoyed this conversation with you, and like the challenges and thoughtfulness put forth in each post.
I believe God's Word is perfect-and human interpretation is not anywhere close sometimes.
In Matthew fifteen, he even chides the Pharisees about dietary laws and other nonsense that was the norm in Leviticus stating that it's not what goes in your mouth that makes you unclean but what comes out of it, as it reflects your heart and mind on a matter.
When it is mentioned in Dueteronomy- God punishes the rapist.
Also slavery then is different of slavery now and the slavery of the 1800's
And that to do such a thing as throw one's soul into hell is not a petty thing to do, like discarding a broken toy. But, something that truly and deeply hurts Him.
Take Jesus's teaching about lusting after a woman being adultery, what Jesus is setting up is tantamount to thought crime and is patently immoral. Without lust none of us would even exist today. To make mere fantasy a sin is just plain wrong.
But God's word isn't God's word, it is the words of ancient men recopied and re-translated a dozen times. Even if the original inspiration was derived from an actual deity its pretty clear that the scriptures themselves are filled with flaws and morally repugnant teachings. Take Jesus's teaching about lusting after a woman being adultery, what Jesus is setting up is tantamount to thought crime and is patently immoral. Without lust none of us would even exist today. To make mere fantasy a sin is just plain wrong. Also, slavery, obviously slavery isn't morally tenable yet Yahweh never takes the time to say so in the Bible despite saving his own "people" from bondage in Egypt.
If God wants us to believe something is his word than the words need to come directly from his mouth, not second hand from some bronze age civilization's scrolls re-translated by European nobility with a hidden agenda.
Throughout the Gospels Christ walks a fine line but he definitely comes out, overall, against the established religion of the day and in favor of some drastic changes. The Love Commandment is one of the shining moments in the Bible as is the Golden Rule I just wish it was those verses that fundamentalists focused on. In fact I've been considering creating my own Bible, sort of the way Thomas Jefferson did, taking out the supernatural and morally repulsive and keeping the good bits.
The rapist pays a fine and gets to marry the woman he assaulted. Whether this is a punishment for the rapist or not is debatable but it definitely is a punishment for the woman. Again this is a case in which the Bible fails miserably to be an apt moral guide. If we assume it was written by ancient Israelites than that makes sense but if we assume, as Fundamentalists do, that these are God's moral precepts than that doesn't make sense unless God is immoral or at least amoral.
In some ways I'm sure it was different. But considering that the Bible gives you tips on how hard you are allowed to beat your slave it is clear that slavery was still violent and was still SLAVERY in every sense of the word. The Bible even says you can sell your daughter as a slave.
Paul may have offered advice on freeing slaves but he also said "slaves obey your Earthly masters".
Can we not agree that some fantasies are morally repugnant?
Hopefully these help shed some light on this.
But, I still don't take Paul by saying to obey your masters that he was saying Slavery is A OKAY.
There are some that think Hell is a rehabilitation center
I would argue that if we take away the right or ability to fantasize or make mere fantasy a sin you run the risk of making people more violent and more immoral.
Many Christians believe that God is a Father.
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
So you say, because in your religion, God is made up.
I have no religion.
Originally posted by rschmfem
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
So you say, because in your religion, God is made up.
I have no religion.
Atheism is a religion... A religion is a collection of beliefs and you are choosing to believe against other religions...
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
So what do you think? If God is a parent, how would you rate his performance either Biblically or in your actual life?