It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
50 flags by this time tomorrow! They're talking about 'ancient' and spend their time talking about da Vinci who lived 500 years ago.
How come these 'ancient robots' aren't depicted, described or represented in the historical record? Why are wooden chariots a game-changing technology if we had 'humanoid warriors?' Alexander the Great was a great military leader yet his armies were equipped with bronze weapons.
Ancient Greeks and Chinese had conceived of steam-powered automata, but there's no evidence that they'd applied these notions to autonomous mechanical soldiers. Likewise, Roman conquest is recorded by the Romans and their occupied nations and yet no contemporary records or historians felt the need to describe robotic hardware?
Genghis Khan and Subatai make no reference to their opponents having robotic technology either.
These TV shows that present 'alternative histories' are actively engaging in the deliberate deception of their audience. They're lying for ratings and ad-revenue. They don't care about the truth or facts.
Originally posted by Wiseupall
reply to post by maythetruthbeknown
Can't find a thing on it. Strange - must have been covered up.?????
Originally posted by Wiseupall
reply to post by Harte
Now was there any need for that. You know when you are an honest person you assume everyone else is and it's so disapointng to find they're not. You may be used to dealing with dishonesty so sorry to disappoint you - you just met someone HONEST.
Originally posted by Arista
reply to post by Wiseupall
I find this - an iceberg hitting a glacier and breaking off a chunk - which scientist speculate could reveal a great deal about the Antarctic continent.
Is this what you were talking about, maybe?
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by Wiseupall
reply to post by Harte
Now was there any need for that. You know when you are an honest person you assume everyone else is and it's so disapointng to find they're not. You may be used to dealing with dishonesty so sorry to disappoint you - you just met someone HONEST.
Really?
You heard or apparently read about something that you cannot find any information on now, and immediately you go to "It's a coverup!"
I wonder why you are on a site that deals with 'cover ups' on second thouughts - I'm not in the least interested. Your just a nasty uncivilised person.
That's intellectually dishonest, in any rational persons book.
Harte
Originally posted by Arista
reply to post by Wiseupall
I often hear things on the news and then go to further research it later and can't find anything - often because I misheard one or more details - You had enough "right" to allow me to find that article with a little bit of research Google is a most wonderful thing, hehe.
One thing that the film had me asking was - What if the materials in the Library of Alexandria, many of which are thought to have been documents and writings from Hebron and those before him - what if those materials gave details of how to build the great structures that we many times contribute to "aliens" - great feats of engineering which appear to be beyond the knowledge of the people of that time? I don't have any "evidence", it was just something I got to thinking... What do you all think?