Have Video Camera... Friends With Visitors

Why does everyone assume that they MUST have way superior advanced technology? Tesla had the concept for such a craft 100 years ago and his patents are under lock and key... We went to War and Hitler used that tech to try to make such craft (whether he did or didn't is irrelevant, but we were close) Had we not wasted all that time with War.. who know? we might already be vacationing on Alpha Centauri...

A space shift drive like that has already been envisioned by Sci Fi so we are talking a difference between us and 'them' of a few hundred years tops... or simply a different approach to science. Maybe 'they' didn't ridicule and shame their scientists when they said 'anti-gravity'



And for those that believe the TR3-B is real... we already have such tech... whether 'reverse engineered', assisted by 'them' or just using something like Tesla tech

Originally posted by zorgon

would not having knowledge convince you of reality?

Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by that.

Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays.

Here you go. I just went out and filmed a minute or two of the landscape, and also so you can see the quality of the camera and the avi file...

02f5603.netsolhost.com...

That’s 30 seconds long, which is 108 meg.

Edward Slayton

Edit-
Holy Cr*p. There was something in the sky that I didn't see while I was out there. ROTFLOL! (6 seconds into the clip )

Originally posted by EdwardSlayton
Holy Cr*p. There was something in the sky that I didn't see while I was out there. ROTFLOL! (6 seconds into the clip

)

Do you mean that white dot over the power lines?

That reminds me of something who could do, get as much information as you can about the birds and other aerial creatures in your area and about any other things that may interfere with your plans.

Edit: another thing, avoid using the digital zoom, that's the source of most of the strange shapes seen in UFO videos.

*SNIP*


Is there some other agenda at play here? Seems like indirect marketing of your site and business.


MOD EDIT: Removed personal information including name, location and personal website. Not allowed here.

Originally posted by ArMaP

Originally posted by EdwardSlayton
Holy Cr*p. There was something in the sky that I didn't see while I was out there. ROTFLOL! (6 seconds into the clip

)

Do you mean that white dot over the power lines?

That reminds me of something who could do, get as much information as you can about the birds and other aerial creatures in your area and about any other things that may interfere with your plans.

Edit: another thing, avoid using the digital zoom, that's the source of most of the strange shapes seen in UFO videos.

edit on 25/12/2010 by ArMaP because: (no reason given)

Yes. The dot. It's moving in the footage, but too small and inconclusive. I couldn't see it in my view screen because the sun was behind me and shining on the screen. Regardless; It's not what I'm after.

I know what you mean about the digital zoom. One thing is; It only goes to 10x. What you saw on the powerlines zoom was the max. The other thing is, again, I'm not after a dot or an orb. If I zoom into a ship that is already the size of a quarter to the human eye, we will only see more details on something that we already know what it is.

Edward Slayton

Originally posted by EdwardSlayton
Here you go. I just went out and filmed a minute or two of the landscape, and also so you can see the quality of
That’s 30 seconds long, which is 108 meg.
*SNIP*

Edward Slayton

Edit-
Holy Cr*p. There was something in the sky that I didn't see while I was out there. ROTFLOL! (6 seconds into the clip

)

edit on 25-12-2010 by EdwardSlayton because: (no reason given)

You could at least load it to youtube


MOD EDIT: Removed personal website. Not allowed here.

reply to post by Red_xi


YouTube is crap. Also, I keep my YouTube account for business-only.

Maybe I'll start a new account later tonight if no one else uploads it.

By the way; I'm changing my link above for those who feel the need to so eloquently "Go for the jugular," wrt my business.

Edward Slayton

It is a great quality video OP and i hope that you are able to film something awesome. The Best of luck to you ) And yes Utube is crap it wreaks any video thats posted there quality wise.

Originally posted by bluemooone2
It is a great quality video OP and i hope that you are able to film something awesome. The Best of luck to you ) And yes Utube is crap it wreaks any video thats posted there quality wise.

Thanks. I created a new YouTube account anyway, for those with download limitations. The video is already uploaded and ready to view...

www.youtube.com...

Edward Slayton

reply to post by ArMaP

Originally posted by ArMaP

Originally posted by Klassified
I think what you must remember, is that many hardcore "skeptics" have no interest in being persuaded.

I'm not interested in being persuaded of anything, I want knowledge, not to be convinced.

I'm not sure I completely understand what you mean here. Maybe I need to clarify my own meaning. In using the words "persuaded" or "convinced", what I am referring to is suitable evidence to persuade or convince. Isn't that the knowledge you speak of? Or are you referring to knowledge above and beyond definitive evidence?

The photo of the Eiffel Tower was filtered in a photo program. Yeah jet exhausts cause heat crazing, but not that extreme. Pixels have been digitally altered in that particular photo.

Originally posted by Klassified
I'm not sure I completely understand what you mean here. Maybe I need to clarify my own meaning. In using the words "persuaded" or "convinced", what I am referring to is suitable evidence to persuade or convince. Isn't that the knowledge you speak of? Or are you referring to knowledge above and beyond definitive evidence?

Being a sceptic, I am never convinced of anything, I just think some things are more likely to be the right explanation than others, so I use the available data to gather more knowledge about some subject and then I use that knowledge to try to see which explanation could be the better one.

I hope that helps.

Originally posted by ArMaP

Originally posted by Klassified
I'm not sure I completely understand what you mean here. Maybe I need to clarify my own meaning. In using the words "persuaded" or "convinced", what I am referring to is suitable evidence to persuade or convince. Isn't that the knowledge you speak of? Or are you referring to knowledge above and beyond definitive evidence?

Being a sceptic, I am never convinced of anything, I just think some things are more likely to be the right explanation than others, so I use the available data to gather more knowledge about some subject and then I use that knowledge to try to see which explanation could be the better one.

I hope that helps.

ITA. Like the thing about the digital zoom on dot and orb UFO's. That drives me nuts. Never impressed. My film UFO pics are about as far I would ever go... which are about 4mm and 3mm wide respectively in a normal sized print.

Although I am also interested in the debunking field, as there are certainly just as many shenanigans going on. Example; Ed Walters in Gulf Breeze, Florida. Took these weird Crown UFO pics and videos for YEARS...

www.popularmechanics.com...

Never debunked until he moved out of his house. Then a "Real Estate Agent" found a paper plate mock-up model version of his crown UFO in the attic of his house AFTER he moved out....

webspace.utexas.edu...

Seriously? That story is even allowed to SPREAD through the UFO community? Can't ANYONE see the fact that it could have been planted? The guy had a perfect character, all his videos and photos passed the skeptic tests, and it all goes down in flames because of the paragraph above. Drives me nuts. That's why, the same way debunkers use technology double-think, I ALSO use "Could he/she have been set up?" double-think for their debunking. Or "Could it be a lie?" double-think. Fair is fair. Two can play at that game.

You know, if someone found child porn in his attic after he moved out and they ran a similar news story, Ed would be able to sue the pants off them. The same should go for the UFO field in the situation of a news story like that. It destroyed his character.

Edward Slayton

Originally posted by groingrinder
The photo of the Eiffel Tower was filtered in a photo program. Yeah jet exhausts cause heat crazing, but not that extreme. Pixels have been digitally altered in that particular photo.

They were examples to illustrate a point as to why one should not expect clear photos of a true UFO... I suspect that the force field around the person is likely also created by CGI.. but since I don't have an actual UFO to use as an example....

I just noticed that you already created a new youtube account, but maybe you could use vimeo later for such things?

Just throwing out a suggestion for you. Good luck with it all!!

Originally posted by LeftKoast
I just noticed that you already created a new youtube account, but maybe you could use vimeo later for such things?

Just throwing out a suggestion for you. Good luck with it all!!

Is there a benefit to a Vimeo account? I don't plan on uploading any dot or orb UFO footage, and none from the night time. So YouTube should be fine. If the object being filmed is not clearly a space craft of some sort... whatever the shape, I won't bother with the upload.

Also an update; I found a location about 1 mile from my house where there's no dwellings in sight, and also has an entry/exit point (as the crow/UFO flies) into complete wilderness for miles, so that no one will see anything. It also has plenty of open space and trees for perspective. After looking at Google maps, I actually decided that my own back yard and the surrounding area IS too populated... and they might be shy about this. I'll hit up the new location on Wednesday for the first time. It's too cold right now...

Monday Night: Mostly clear, with a low around 27.
Tuesday: Sunny, with a high near 60.
Tuesday Night: Mostly clear, with a low around 30.
Wednesday: Sunny, with a high near 68.

Edward Slayton

I think the advantage to vimeo is purely resolution based. Vimeo seems to have very nice quality images in their videos. Also that site isn't clouded with millions upon millions of worthless videos (yes there are worthless vids, but I think you understand what I mean when talking about youtube).