It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AnotherYOU
reply to post by Realtruth
it's not really a selfless action as i see it, you are interfering on that person's lifepath, to wich death is always the outcome.
Death is nothing to us, since when we are, death has not come, and when death has come, we are not. Epicurus
Originally posted by AnotherYOU
True too.
but aren't we suposed to love ALL, with no exceptions?
suddently what looks like an act of love might seem like the ultimate nihilism.
but i get where the OP was trying to aim at, i understood the spirit.
Originally posted by AnotherYOU
reply to post by Realtruth
Thank You for the welcome.
i know wich love i spoke of, theres only one.
if it has any conditionality associated with it it's not love.
"whatever's right"
Originally posted by frugal
When you really love some one fully and they die it is agony forever.
Originally posted by Aliensun
"We each operate according to what we preceive to be in our best, self interest."
By examining that statement in your own mind, it always comes down to what you think you want, again, nothing more, nothing less.
Originally posted by sonjah1
reply to post by jamiros
No offense, but I think you are confusing "romantic' love and "agape" love...the latter of which I think the threadperson is talking about.
Or...I would say "romantic' love is *usually* conditional, while "agape" is unconditional.
The mother/child example listed in the OP is a no-brainer to me. What mother would not give their life for their child?