It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


NEW Graphic Analysis on the Videos of UFO's over KUMBURGAZ, TURKEY w/ ET Pics

page: 1
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

+44 more 
posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 01:19 AM
So I found this it took me a whole while to read and im still dont really no what to think of it...
I thought I would put this to the minds here on ATS
and sponge in what yall posted about this as a few
whether crazy legit or whatever...
there is alot of content and no matter you point of view it is interesting...

SUMMARY OF THE CASE This case developed in the location of Kumburgaz between the years 2007, 2008 and 2009. Its main witness was a night guard named Yalcin Yalman, while on duty who registered on video these estrange objects that appeared at sunrise like floating or changing while in flight over the sea coast of Marmara. Yalman was able to film many video segments, some during day light accompanied by witnesses with whom he spoke to while he was filming. One singularity of this case was that de images were made with a camera that had an adaptor for close ups of 200X, achieving a great amount of details of the objects. At first, the videos were analyzed and made public by the SIRIUS UFO organization, directed by the researcher Haktan Akdogan. This case made big news in Turkey and in other countries as well. It also started a great debate between the official members of the Turkish scientific community. Specifically the NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE STUDY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (TUBITAK) got interested in analyzing the original footage, with the intention of determining that the video was nothing more than a hoax, gambling on the idea of scale models or toys, or CGI. The original tape was handed to the TUBITAK representatives on live TV in their own headquarters. Once the analysis concluded, they gave an official report, from which we took the following fragment: "The objects observed on the images have a structure made of a specific material and definitely itís no any kind of CGI animation or in any means a type of special effects used for simulation in a studio or for video effects. So the conclusion of this report is that the observations are not a model, maquette or a fraud". At the last part of the report, it's concluded that the objects observed have a physical structure and are made of materials that donít belong to any category (airplanes, helicopters, meteors, Venus, Mars, Satellites, artificial lights, Chinese lanterns, etc.) and that it mostly fits in the category of UFO's (Unidentified Flying Objects and of unknown origin). Other analysis were done by video specialist, image edition and special effect companies from Japan, Russia and Turky, all ending up with the same conclusions. In Chile, I ask professor José Atenas for his cooperation, expert in graphics and video edition, with more than 30 years of experience on television, to technically examine the videos. In his appreciation, José Atenas also came to the same conclusions that the images are authentic. So far nobody has been able to demonstrate that the recordings are product of tricks or some type of manipulation. Therefore, the debate has concentrated more over the nature and origin of the objects filmed by Yalcin Yalman.

and the link

Analysis of UFO Video w/ ET Pics

edit on 13-12-2010 by antibren because: (no reason given)

edit on Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:47:29 -0600 by JacKatMtn because: title edit per member request.

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 01:38 AM
Super find, glad someone took the time to analysis this footage. Just hope there is more info to come and this doesn't get brushed under the rug.

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 01:47 AM
reply to post by antibren

Found it,

Sirius Research Foundation

This is where the footage was first submitted and analysed.

edit on 13-12-2010 by Nick_X because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 01:53 AM
Here is the original....

and here is a old thread with old analysis of the Video....

and just before someone complains about their already being a thread...
I think this new analysis deserves its own thread as it is new light being shed

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 01:53 AM

Let me first admit that I clicked the link for the sole purpose of viewing the pics. If the pics aren't conclusive evidence enough to me, I won't bother reading the text.

I have 20/13 vision. I saw only vague photographs that didn't depict much more than what one could build conjecture upon. The nature of the text is subjective, therefore, to me anyhow. In my line of rationality...

As much as I would like to believe we have visitors, I'd like to see an undeniable "proof" of such.

On a side note; in the eighties I once saw an orange "orb" glowing in a mid-afternoon sky about 10,000 feet high, maybe three miles to the East that I couldn't do much but shrug-off the fact that I seen "something" in the flesh.

I do know that as it hovered/floated, it was too big to be a helicopter that far away drifting that slowly. Nor was it a blimp, a balloon. I only know what it was not...I'm fascinated with aero-phenomena, though, and so- S&F!

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 01:56 AM
That is amazing !
The time alone that it took to do
This might be the strangest thing I've ever seen.
Pretty impressive to say the least. well
here they come..... the skeptics ,good luck
with this one guy's

Oh yea,S&F. Thanks
edit on 13-12-2010 by BrainGarden because: S&F

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 02:21 AM
reply to post by antibren

This seems to be the most conclusive video out there.
I pity the poor person that they have abducted.
Now, we should shoot the demons down!

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 03:13 AM
The Turkey UFO sightings is one of my favorite! These images and study by the author is very well done! Now, I remember a lot of people saying this wasnt a UFO, but a yacht out at sea, I dont think that would hold up against these photos and analysis. I forget which footage was being discussed as there were 3 different sightings over as many years, but this study debunks that idea in my opinion. Some also suggested this was a model 'UFO' hung by a string, later effects were added, etc.. But this was denied by the TUBIAK scientific center in Turkey, but the validity of the study is always argued as they just said it was legit footage to bring business and publicity to their center

I think some of the distortion (besides from the zoom and being far away) is the possibility the ET's are traveling in and out of dimensions or possibly their whole molecular life form is different than ours, maybe vibrating at a higher frequency, including their crafts (Just an idea, dont kill me people
).These seem to be the typical 'grey' we hear about. These entities look identical to the 'Alien Interview' alien, even the somewhat jerky movement that is shown in the analysis. Im very interested in what some of our resident ATS members have to say about this study. I do believe these sightings to be real and possibly some of the best evidence to date if we could all get on one page, unfortunately that will never happen.

edit on 13/12/10 by ziggyproductions05 because: (no reason given)

edit on 13/12/10 by ziggyproductions05 because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 09:37 AM
This footage is indeed astounding. It looks pretty damn authentic star, flag, and favorite for you OP. What I just don't understand is why these aliens would "open the sunroof" so to speak while examining a body
I don't get that logic.....

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 10:07 AM
This kind of reminds me of an edge of a metal wrist watch with winder close up.

Interesting footage all the same.

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 10:41 AM
Sorry to be ignorant, but did anybody investigate the reason the date in the video keeps changing? Seems this thing is always there?

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 11:00 AM
I personally believe that this is a para glider being towed by a speedboat.....not that I know anything just what I believe.....

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 11:46 AM
Awesome analysis! This string of sightings (because they lasted for a couple years) is one of my favorites because the footage is quite clear, from different perspectives, at different times and dates, showing the same object in different configurations. The analysis is well done and conservative (of course his conclusion is aliens, but that's what the analysis seems to reveal - he never says for sure what it is, only does his best to interpret the data). The image editing techniques seem sound.

This one is getting archived, thanks for posting!

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 11:53 AM
I like to think now this is the real deal....

it was originally said to be Scale models with toys

haha but these are as stated obviously not static objects....

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 12:04 PM
If this is real, those seemingly alien bodies in the craft are freaky looking. But then I'm always on the fence of whether or not real aliens would look anything like what we've speculated. Looks like the common grey aliens everyone talks about. Or like a sonogram of a fetus. Creeepy.

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 12:29 PM
Uh....for the first time in my entire life, i saw at least something that suggests alien vistation.

I am always skeptic however, some of those pictures didnt really say anything to me, but a few did, and to me the one looking towards the window, does not look happy.

Like it is aware of the camraman, and very displeased, i couldnt shake that feeling, that it really was very unhappy when the camraman looked.

on 12 it looks (while very pissed) 13 it informs the other two 14 and 15 seems to be getting a better look, and on 16 it informs them again (perhaps of the camramans excat location)

It's eyes are so big, like in my dreams, how i always imagned. Big black and for some reason scary.

I have my theories, and it is possible that these arent aliens, but people from the future, thousands or perhaps millions of years, through natural evolution and genetic engineering, our decendants could look like that.

I cant get over those eyes, so huge, so black, ...beyond perfect eyesight.

Why isnt there more of these? or better yet, why doesnt everyone have an HD camra?

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 12:32 PM
reply to post by SpaceJ

the grey? is the future of human evolution, thousands or millions of years. That is why there is no disclosure, could mess up the future, say hello, to your decendants, pretty scary looking eh?

Now you know why they look so much like us.

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 12:47 PM
reply to post by Anthony1138

I think these are more like Ebens rather than Grays....

but yes as you said...
these are very chilling
I think they are prolly pretty use too be photographed ...
it is only of my opinion and not so much of Marios
but I think they are already familiar with who is taking their picture
I think sometimes they want to be seen...

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 12:58 PM
reply to post by antibren

what is an eben? (sounds famliar) I thought the 2 working on the body (which looked human) were greys while the one looking, wasnt a grey, but perhaps, whatever it was, is in control of the greys?

The two working seemed to have no interset of what was outside, so perhaps those greys are under some sort of indoctrination, humans are turned into greys and you have to do what your told?

They could be famliar with the camraman, and they might want to be seen, but then why does it seem to pissed off? perhaps its just camra shy lol

But what do you think of the possiblity of them being from the future?

posted on Dec, 13 2010 @ 01:54 PM
reply to post by arise91

You should have read the study before asking questions like that. This UFO was filmed three different times over a three year period.

new topics

top topics

<<   2  3  4 >>

log in