It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by McGinty
Originally posted by DGFenrir
"Hey, dude! Can I use your bank account? My own account is frozen and I need some funds to be transferred to me. I'll give my friend your account details and he'll transfer the money there, then you withdraw it, okay?"
What happened here is Joe (the guy with the frozen account) was selling something online that he didn't even have. He managed to find a buyer who was willing to pay up front. The money was transferred and then withdrawn, the buyer never got his product.
Who should you go after? The trusting friend who owns the bank account or the actual thief?
This is not helping at all. People are starting to see Wikileaks as the bad guys, even more than before..edit on 9/12/2010 by DGFenrir because: (no reason given)
If they choose to target more sites that effect common people then it could be possible that 'anonymous' is a US government op to manipulate public opinion against Wikileaks - a cyber-false flag that would have the common press etc calling for their destruction just like they did for 'Al Qaeda' after 9/11...
Then again, it may be Wikileaks desire to target 'the common people' to get their attention - to sensitize them to this issue and affect a call for its resolution. dangerous game that could back fire as described above.
I guess the most plausible reason for their targets is that they feel that these wealthy institutions have enough influence to affect Assange's release.
Originally posted by sakokrap
reply to post by mr-lizard
Depending upon one's country, applicable laws, and all that jazz,
is there anything us non-hackers can do to support these efforts, but without breaking any applicable laws?
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
reply to post by mr-lizard
Just try to go to visa. com or follow the anon tweeter feed.
Originally posted by wayno
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
reply to post by mr-lizard
Just try to go to visa. com or follow the anon tweeter feed.
I followed up your twitter link and the page that came up said that account was suspended.
Is twitter blacklissting these guys??
Originally posted by monkey_descendant
Originally posted by McGinty
Originally posted by DGFenrir
"Hey, dude! Can I use your bank account? My own account is frozen and I need some funds to be transferred to me. I'll give my friend your account details and he'll transfer the money there, then you withdraw it, okay?"
What happened here is Joe (the guy with the frozen account) was selling something online that he didn't even have. He managed to find a buyer who was willing to pay up front. The money was transferred and then withdrawn, the buyer never got his product.
Who should you go after? The trusting friend who owns the bank account or the actual thief?
This is not helping at all. People are starting to see Wikileaks as the bad guys, even more than before..edit on 9/12/2010 by DGFenrir because: (no reason given)
If they choose to target more sites that effect common people then it could be possible that 'anonymous' is a US government op to manipulate public opinion against Wikileaks - a cyber-false flag that would have the common press etc calling for their destruction just like they did for 'Al Qaeda' after 9/11...
Then again, it may be Wikileaks desire to target 'the common people' to get their attention - to sensitize them to this issue and affect a call for its resolution. dangerous game that could back fire as described above.
I guess the most plausible reason for their targets is that they feel that these wealthy institutions have enough influence to affect Assange's release.
Wikileaks is not affiliated with anonymous or any of these cyber attackers. It says so on their site.
Originally posted by mr-lizard
It's happening right now. To the second.
Nothing on the news yet, but it's time to wait and see.
The Interpol website is up and down all over the world at the moment.
See for yourself.
www.interpol.int...edit on 8-12-2010 by mr-lizard because: (no reason given)edit on 8-12-2010 by mr-lizard because: (no reason given)
EDIT: They seem to be hopping between numerous targets - although mastercard and paypal are now seemingly the main 2 targetsedit on 8-12-2010 by mr-lizard because: (no reason given)edit on 8-12-2010 by mr-lizard because: (no reason given)
It looks like the group that successfully took down the website of Julian Assange's Swiss Bank have claimed another victim.
Mastercard.com is down, and Anon_operation just tweeted that it's due to a DDOS attack. Of course, Mastercard is one of the payment services that cut off the ability to donate to Wikileaks:
www.sockroll.com...
edit on 8-12-2010 by mr-lizard because: (no reason given)
Anonymous' intentions are very clear. We are not vigilantes, regardless of the sentiment of quoting Boondock Saints, we are people on a campaign for freedom. Anonymous' intentions are to change the current way the governments of the world and the people view true Freedom of Speech and The Internet. Anonymous is willing, ready, and able to campaign for the freedom for all. We are campaigning right now as you read the news, watch the television, fight with your
significant other, love your children, hate your neighbor, criticize the man or woman next to you. We are campaigning. The goal is simple: Win the right to keep the Internet free of any control from any entity, corporation, or government. We will do this until our, proverbial, dying breath. We do this not only for our selves, but for the world and its people at large.