reply to post by NonKonphormist
I feel you are correct as the Carpenter people refer to as Jesus of Nazareth today is and was Not
What you said about the Christ is Correct, as the Name given as "Christ" is a state of Office and Not
a persons name.
However I think you will find reports of a person who evaded the Roman sensus, did in fact go round talking about the Christ, but sadly today Roman
doctrine mixes these two together, claiming them to be one and the same, just as they claim A’Dam and MAN to be one and the Same.
In the Case of A’Dam and MAN in the Genesis the titles given…
A’Dam was the title for the Primate.
MAN was the title for the Soul.
So it also the Case regarding these titles in the N.T
The "Christ" is The First Born or only Begotten of The Father which is The LIGHT
of Men or The LIFE
“The Son of MAN” or sometimes more correctly “The MAN Child” Refers to The First Born Soul,
When returns to the Soul (each at a different time, hence No man knoweth the hour.) appears in the Centre of the Soul
When “The Son of MAN” has returned it is then referred to as “The MAN Child” (See in the Revelation of Jesus Christ.).
The "Son of God" refers to The Soul.
Now with regards to the "Carpenter", here is a part of an Ancient Christian writing called…
“John’s Preaching of the Gospel
” The Acts of John 87-105
Verse 99. Quote;
99. This Cross then is that which has united ALL things by The WORD
and which has separated off what is Transitory and Inferior,
which has also Compacted ALL things into ONE.
But this is NOT that WOODEN CROSS which you shall see
when you go down from here;
nor am I the man who is on the Cross,
I whom now you do not see but only hear My Voice.
I was taken to be what I am NOT, I who am NOT
what for many others I was;
but what they will say of Me is mean and unworthy of Me.
Since then the Place of My Rest is neither to be seen nor told,
much more shall I, The Lord of this Place, be neither seen nor told.
The above shows the difference between the two. (The Carpenter on the wooden Cross and the Christ who talked of The Cross of LIGHT
in the Writing.
The whole confusion comes about by the Roman Church and their offshoot denominations, teach falsely that the two are one and the same.
Remember these writings were written some time after the Carpenter and not by any of the desciples, in some cases perhaps 100 years later.
Yet the Desciples were reported to often write to each other or write in books and show the others.
But these books are not avaliable today... Why ???
But at the time these things occurred, is Not
what is preached now.
I believe that the Carpenter
spoke of The "Christ" and often The Christ spoke through
The Christian writings which are around today, as well as the Roman collection referred to as the bible, do Not
identify fully, who the
disciples were, neither who the Carpenter Jesus was,
Yet at that Time the Romans had an annual Public sensus for taxation purposes, even mentioned in the writings so this being the case each person could
be identified and if such a record existed to day then it should exist in Rome perhaps in the Vatican. If the Carpenters ID
did exist I doubt
that such would be released as it would bring up too many other questions, regarding the Carpenter after the Resurrection, and the other countries He
went Eastward to, i.e. India and China. Remember the "Han" are in China and were mainly farmers.
The old Churches, Monasteries and Vatican still have the "Geometry" the Carpenter taught, in their buildings today but the Doctrine of Rome never
teaches this. Why???
However the Chinese have this "Geometric Décor" in most of their public buildings and Government buildings today as well. Why ???
To find reference to Language and a very, very small fragment about this "Geometry" is recorded in…
“The Infancy Gospel of Thomas
” verse 6 Quote;
And he told Him all the Letters from Alpha to Omega clearly, with much questioning.
But He (Jesus) looked at Zacchaeus the teacher and said to him:
"How do you, who do not know the Alpha according to its nature,
teach others the Beta ?
Hypocrite, first if you know it, teach the Alpha,
and then we shall believe you concerning the Beta."
Then He (Jesus) began to question the teacher about the First Letter,
and he was unable to answer Him.
And in the hearing of many The Child said to Zacchaeus:
"Hear, teacher, the arrangement of the First Letter,
and pay heed to this, how it has Lines and a Middle Mark
which goes through the Pare of Lines which you see,
how these Lines converge, rise, turn in the dance,
Three Signs of the Same Kind,
( That is to say: of the Same Length )
subject to and supporting one another, of Equal proportions;
hear you have the lines of The Alpha."
Note in Verse 14. Quote;
and he took Him (Jesus) and handed Him over to another teacher.
And the teacher said to Joseph:
"FIRST I will teach Him GREEK,
and THEN HEBREW."
For the teacher knew The Child's knowledge and was afraid of Him.
Greek, and Not
Hebrew or Latin ???
Well the Greek Language Fonts came from The ZIONic Language (the Language of the Soul) as did All Language Fonts and Glyphs.
edit on 25-11-2010 by The Matrix Traveller because: (no reason given)
edit on 25-11-2010 by The Matrix Traveller because: