It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by backinblack
The "suspicious photos" with EXIF data are available here:
www.flickr.com...
There is no evidence that a missile was launched. There is very strong evidence that the contrail was caused by UPS flight 902.
Originally posted by Riffrafter
reply to post by Phage
There is no evidence that a missile was launched. There is very strong evidence that the contrail was caused by UPS flight 902.
Phage - I'm curious, I thought you and a few other people were saying for a few days that it was a US Air flight? Why the change to a UPS flight? Did the US Air flight not "work" for some reason?
BTW - That must have been a very special contrail:
1 - A contrail expert from NASA said it was a missile.
2 - It was seen and photographed from Space, and other NASA scientists also thought it was a missile.
Here's the story regarding the above:
Infamous Contrail (aka 'the Mystery Missile') Spotted in Satellite Image
On a final note, this NASA contrail expert is still saying it's from flight AWE808, not UPS 902...
It appears the "experts" can't quite get their stories straight either. That's usually a pretty big red flag that something is wrong with the "official" line in my experience....
xmpMM:History
* rdf:Seq
o rdf:li
+ stEvt:action = "saved"
+ stEvt:instanceID = "xmp.iid:08801174072068118DBBC28B45CB8315"
+ stEvt:when = "2010-11-10T15:48:36-08:00"
+ stEvt:softwareAgent = "Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh"
+ stEvt:changed = "/"
o rdf:li
+ stEvt:action = "saved"
+ stEvt:instanceID = "xmp.iid:09801174072068118DBBC28B45CB8315"
+ stEvt:when = "2010-11-10T15:49:27-08:00"
+ stEvt:softwareAgent = "Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh"
+ stEvt:changed = "/"
o rdf:li
+ stEvt:action = "saved"
+ stEvt:instanceID = "xmp.iid:0A801174072068118DBBC28B45CB8315"
+ stEvt:when = "2010-11-10T15:50:05-08:00"
+ stEvt:softwareAgent = "Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh"
+ stEvt:changed = "/"
1 - A contrail expert from NASA said it was a missile.
2 - It was seen and photographed from Space, and other NASA scientists also thought it was a missile.
After watching footage of the Nov. 8 contrail, Patrick Minnis, a contrail expert in the Science Directorate at NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va., assumed it came from a missile, as many others did.
With the help of other Langley researchers, Minnis also learned that on Nov. 9, conditions were "ripe" for persistent contrails over the Pacific west of Los Angeles, but that the contrails would only survive for a short time closer to the coast.
"As it turns out, the high clouds seen in the background of the video were actually behind the contrail because the plane had flown north of the clouds, and changed course to the northeast, so that the clouds were behind the contrail as viewed from Catalina Island," Minnis said. "All of that information changed my mind."
Because you were diligent and honest and provided a link to your source, I'm going to give your post a star. This entire "mystery" revolves around sources, There is a single source for the video. If any portion of it is inaccurate or deliberately misleading, it becomes impossible to draw definitive conclusions.
If true....the contrail theory seems to be falling apart.
There is no easy way to tell from the EXIF data if the image was manipulated. It would be nice if that were true, but simply "saving" the image changes the "LastModified" parameter because Photoshop changes the metadata for the image when it is saved.
Have you analyzed the images? Have you found real evidence of tampering?