It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

US Navy CONFIRMS it was a Missle off Catialina

page: 1
17
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:29 PM
link   
US NAVY Now says that the missle seen off Catalina Island was a test of US Naval capibilities.

Reported by: www.blacklistednews.com...

From page 55.
"434/10(18).


EASTERN NORTH PACIFIC.
CALIFORNIA.
MISSILES.

1. INTERMITTENT MISSILE FIRING OPERATIONS 0001Z TO 2359Z
DAILY MONDAY THRU SUNDAY IN THE NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER
SEA RANGE. THE MAJORITY OF MISSILE FIRINGS TAKE PLACE
1400Z TO 2359Z AND 0001Z TO 0200Z DAILY MONDAY THRU FRIDAY
IN AREA BOUND BY
...

3. VESSELS INBOUND AND OUTBOUND FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PORTS
WILL CREATE THE LEAST INTERFERENCE TO FIRING OPERATIONS
DURING THE SPECIFIC PERIODS, AS WELL AS ENHANCE THE VESSEL'S SAFETY WHEN PASSING THROUGH THE VICINITY OF THE SEA RANGE
IF THEY WILL TRANSIT VIA THE SANTA BARBARA CHANNEL AND WITHIN
NINE MILES OFFSHORE VICINITY OF POINT MUGU OR CROSS THE AREA
SOUTHWEST OF SAN NICOLAS ISLAND BETWEEN SUNSET AND SUNRISE.


SO it was a missle.,

Don't you just love how the dis-infomation is so in your face in the country. The US has no creditability.First it was a plane then it was an illusion ,next it was a missle but it was not US, now it was US.

Our country is a joke.


edit on 16-11-2010 by brokedown because: to give by line to source


PLAGIARISM & EXTERNAL TAGS
Mod Edit: No Quote/Plagiarism – Please Review This Link.
Mod Edit: External Source Tags Instructions – Please Review This Link.


edit on 2010/11/16 by GradyPhilpott because: added link to quoted material and added external source tags.




posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:29 PM
link   
Source please?

~Heff



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:31 PM
link   
reply to post by brokedown
 


Where did you get this information from, may I have a link of some sort? May I have evidence. I am also of the belief that it may have been a missile, however we need hard evidence.



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Hefficide
 


Indeed my friend I to would like to see the source of such information. One Love.



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hefficide

Source please?

~Heff



I don't think a source matters.

No where in there does it say they fired a missile on that day or time.



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:32 PM
link   
Anxiously awating a source. Thank you



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:37 PM
link   
My you guys are quick.

I got it from Stan Deyo. com

source is blacklistednews.com



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:37 PM
link   
They sure didn't share that information with the media ... wonder why?



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher


I don't think a source matters.

No where in there does it say they fired a missile on that day or time.


Exactly.
All the references to that quote are from blogs and the dates vary from Aug - Nov
e.g - PDF Link
edit on 2010/11/16 by GradyPhilpott because: edited nested quote



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:39 PM
link   
I don't understand. It's common knowledge that they launch near Point Mugu and that bit of text says nothing about any specific missile launch. I'm not connecting the dots here...



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:41 PM
link   
Put the first paragraph of the OP into go0gle and you get links back to a gazillion different forums and blogs. Example: infowars Ireland

____________________________
The info. appears to have come from No. 45 US Notice to Mariners... Go to the pdf, pg 55 and it's a straight up copy/paste.

____________________________
I missed the confirmation OP - why don't you point it out specifically...
edit on 16-11-2010 by LadySkadi because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:45 PM
link   
Blacklistednews? You have so got to be kidding. They make The Enquirer look legit.



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:46 PM
link   
The connecting dots are that today in this country when a normal citizen see and videos a missle launch off the US Coast - WHICH IS A MAJOR HAPPENING- the Media and the Government will do everything in there power to try to convice us that we did not see what we saw , we are confussed, "NOTHING HERE TO SEE, JUST MOVE ALONG"



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:48 PM
link   
[Removed unnecessary quote of entire previous post]

Aren't you fogetting that it was the MEDIA in the first place that reported on this and called it a missile?

I guess they were telling the truth then...but not now...right?

Mod Edit: Quoting – Please Review This Link.


edit on 2010/11/16 by GradyPhilpott because: see notes above



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by brokedown
US NAVY Now says that the missle seen off Catalina Island was a test of US Naval capibilities.


SO it was a missle.,



edit on 16-11-2010 by brokedown because: to give by line to source


Until I see an official press release from the Navy or a Navy spokesman they have not CONFIRMED it as you put it! I'm still undecided. But this is no way confirmation from the Navy.
edit on 16-11-2010 by phatpackage because: (no reason given)

edit on 2010/11/16 by GradyPhilpott because: edited large quote



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 02:58 PM
link   
I think the original source is www.legitgov.org...



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 03:40 PM
link   
I have added the source link and external source tags to the OP.

Please respond to that material as the subject of this thread.

Grady


edit on 2010/11/16 by GradyPhilpott because: grammar and syntax



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 03:47 PM
link   
I dont care if it was a missile, plane or Wendy the witch on her broomstick...
I just wonder WHY, after a week, NO ONE can tell us officialy what it was !!!!!

Sure, many have posted articles about other times people thought they saw missiles when it was nothing more than a contrail.
But every time it was quicky proved to be a plane right down to the flight details....

Not this time!! We are still waiting for an explanation....



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 04:09 PM
link   
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions



posted on Nov, 16 2010 @ 04:41 PM
link   
i have 3 friends that were all marines, 2 of which served in desert shield or storm or one of those oil recovery 'wars'... point is they told me the news is so biased here, they tell you one thing before they even know the truth on the subject, and the bigger problem being all the untruths they tell... i would have to say no matter the coverage i believe it to be some sort of missile testing, as do my ex-marine friends and they said if you want a LESS biased news to stick with bbc since they are not here they are not trying to protect the general american public's 'delicate ears and minds' from the truth...



new topics

top topics



 
17
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join