posted on Nov, 12 2010 @ 12:08 PM
Something that I have noticed here on ATS is that some people make claims that are without a basis, and far too many people just accept this statement
as having more merit than it should. A basis is support for an idea that exists outside of the idea. For example, a basis for gravity is that things
fall when we drop them. The falling object isn't gravity, but it lends support to the idea of gravity.
The fundamental problem of belief is that it can't go back to itself for its basis, except to the person with the belief (and sometimes, not even to
them.) If you believe something -- say, that Jesus was an extraterrestrial -- that belief is not (well, should not be,) a convincing argument for
anyone other than yourself. In addition, merely finding other people who believe the same thing as you is not evidence of anything other than
evidence of belief.
This becomes problematic, because such a belief cannot be questioned. If one asks "why do you believe this?" the only answer available is "because
I do," because there is no other basis. Take, for example, the "missile" of the coast of California recently. There is now a video of Colleen
Thomas stating that this incident was the United States attempting to shoot down an alien spacecraft. Her proof? None. Her basis? That's what she
believes. This should convince no one, and yet it most likely will.
I will say it again, for clarity. The fact that you believe something is not a reason, in any way, for anyone else to believe it. If your wife is a
Christian, but you are not, her belief may make you think differently about Christianity, but it is no reason to start believing in it. If your
parents are Muslim, it surely impacted the way that you were raised, but it is not a reason to just arbitrarily become (or stay) Muslim.
The counterpoint to this is a fundamental aspect of cults. Because the key beliefs of the leader rarely have their basis in evidence, members need to
believe simply because the charismatic leader believes (or claims to believe, I'm sure that some leaders don't drink their own Kool-Aid.) This is
further brokered by the dismissal of questions, ostensibly because "you have to have faith and not question!" but, in reality, the perspective is
forced because there are no answers to the questions, because the belief lacks a basis.
When you are told to believe something and not question it, that is a fair sign that you are being told to believe something which is not believable,
and for which there is no reasonable basis. When you are dismissed by statements that you are questioning things because you simply can't understand
them, or you haven't been enlightened, or other things that don't respond to your questions, but merely discharge them, it is another fair sign that
you are looking at a belief without basis.
There is nothing wrong with a person holding a belief that is without basis, of course. Millions do. But there is something wrong with people
insisting that you believe what they believe, simply because they do. What proof did Marshall Applewhite have of a spacecraft in the tail of
Hale-Bopp? None. Yet 38 Heaven's Gate believers followed him to their deaths, because they believed something without basis.
I am an Orthodox, Catholic leaning Protestant Christian. I have gone down many paths to get where I am today, but all of them have involved
questioning my beliefs, and the beliefs of others, to determine what the basis of my faith truly is. The result (well, the current result,) is a
strong faith that I can defend, not merely from a "because I believe" perspective, but from a rational, reasoned position that has basis beyond the
belief.
Here in the ATS community, I would say that most of my best friends are non-believers, and I regularly participate in atheistic threads. Not because
I want to change anyone's mind, but because their questions make me question, and the act of questioning requires me to have an answer, one which is
thoughtful and defensible. I consider it the "benefit of doubt", and I'm thankful for the opportunity to refine and reflect upon my faith.
But I think that far too many people experience exactly the opposite when they encounter organized religion, and this is what drives some away. Ask a
priest or a minister a tough question, and the worst answer I think that they can give is "you just need to have faith," as this goes back to the
original point about basis. I agree that you need to have faith, but telling you so doesn't give it to you, and allowing that to be your only answer
to a specific question is intellectually dishonest.
For those who may have experienced this from organized religion, please recognize that it is not endemic. If someone dismisses your questions, find
someone else to ask, because the answer to your question should be as important to the person you ask as it is for you.
In my opinion, that is a sign of true faith.