posted on Oct, 31 2010 @ 09:33 PM
Transferring your mind into a machine is, really, impossible. Technology will never be able to rectify this. However - machines/computers can
certainly augment your human body.
The human body is superior, anyway. Our body can live forever, in a sense. The cause of aging is the degradation of the DNA within your cells.
Telomeres stave off this process for a time - but they, too degrade and the cell eventually fails. Telomeres are 'junk' DNA that are not used in
protein synthesis. One must then wonder how bacteria stay alive. The answer is they regulate the telomere length - rebuilding junk DNA as necessary.
No known multicellular organism does the same thing - but our cells are more than capable of accomplishing the task.
That resolves replicating tissues. Non-replicating tissues are not as easy to resolve, but research into the behavior of adult and embryonic stem
cells should serve us well.
The cold hard reality is that you'll be hard-pressed to surpass the human body in functionality. Packing the same power/weight into something the
size of our bodies is no easy task, and then to make it efficient enough to allow something resembling a normal life (let alone enhanced) is pretty
impractical. If you want to be a cyborg, you're better off with a powered armor/exoskeleton that you can take off and let sit on the charger after
you've gotten your 2 hours of use out of it.
And that is what I mean by augmentation. That's a simple form of augmentation. More complex varieties will be cybernetic implants that will allow
you to expand your mind's capabilities into the digital world while keeping your brain. Why rush off to a calculator when you can 'read' math like
you would read a sentence? Why wonder where you are when you can 'see' yourself in a mental image of your surroundings?
As for "download learning" - not really practical. Each person's neural networks are so individual in their relationships (and their specific
method for storing memory) as to be impossible to simply "learn." Further - motor-skills involve the training of the peripheral nervous system
(which is involved in processing motor commands) - which is well beyond the scope of any practical implant.
That's not to say implants couldn't assist you in learning how to operate new machinery, martial arts, a new subject, etc - but it would still be up
to you to actually learn and utilize such an aid.
I imagine the context of schools would change. Primary schooling would consist of teaching children basic reading, math, comprehension, etc - but
also focus on training children to interact with their implants. A child cannot understand an implant for math/arithmetic if they have no sense of
numbers to begin with.
I imagine nanobots would be the primary method of constructing implants - creating sensors within the neural fabric of the brain without being
destructive - a series of laminates just under the skull serve as a basic digital interface, wireless data link (likely very short range - only a few
feet - specialty devices allowing greater range would be external, worn on the belt, sewn into clothing, etc), and have a myriad of basic features.
In theory - the entire implant could be upgraded through subsequent injections of nanobots as technology advances, or be removed rather painlessly.
In that context - I would certainly augment. The amount of time that could save in 3d design/prototyping is so priceless as to be - well, priceless.