reply to post by Brahmanite
I have already explained in the original post, and then more precisely on page 15 (please check
) that this thread is NOT about the files and their content but about
the treatement of the information by the MSM, mainly CNN, specifically by Atika Shubert AND that there are already *other* threads dealing with the
files and their content.
Hope it clears it up
I certainly hope I won't have to re-explain this at every pages.
Originally posted by Xtraeme
While I applaud your gusto in going through all of the posts and collecting some real numbers on which side of the line people land. I specifically
I'm not even sure if that would stand a statistical analysis if we were do a post count for or rabidly against.
I know you did ask for post count, hence why I explained I did a count per user instead because I believe a post count doesn't make sense and gives
weight only to trolls and to people repeating the same thing over and over while being oblivious to other people's posts. Now anyway, there is only
one very obvious rabid troll that could skew the count, but even then, even with a post count we're not going anywhere near what you qualified as
"this entire thread is an attempt to bash"
Originally posted by XtraemeI think perhaps you misunderstood my point. I was suggesting that there's a disproportionate acceptance
amongst ATS staff in terms of allowing strongly worded, if not downright defamatory, posts against Assange. Whereas people who even allude to
small logical stupidities posted by ATS'ers are immediately labeled "off topic," or have their posts outright edited by moderators who usually use
the T&C as justification for their actions.
Again you're not checking your facts there have been people edited on both sides of the fence. The troll has been edited, YOU indeed have been
edited, some people in favour of Assange have been edited, some conspiracy theorists that didn't take side have been edited, and lastly some people
bashing Assange have been edited as well.
Originally posted by Xtraeme
This is why counting by post, not members is interesting. Make sense now?
And again I disagree with you. Counting by post would foremost and only be a call to trolls to come troll more.
Anyway, at this point i'm considering you're trolling this thread because :
1) You're stating as facts things that are untrue, whether they're counted by user or post count. I've done the user count, and it's heavily
against your statement. And since there has been but only one obvious diffamatory troll, even when doing a count by posts we would still not be
anywhere close : this thread is heavily in favour of Assange no matter what kind of count is made.
2) You're not the one bringing proofs, you're only bringing unproven statements, over and over again.
3) Your view about the fact that "there's a disproportionate acceptance amongst ATS staff in terms of allowing strongly worded, if not downright
IS off topic and i'd appreciate you bring the point directly to the ATS staff instead of polluting this thread with it.