It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
The US Supported and supplied the Mujahadin not the Taliban. The Taliban came to power a while after the US support stopped.
Originally posted by Zamini
Again, another poster who seems to be confused by words.
READING COMPREHENSION.
I will help: Oozy is saying that when you are in your house, taking cover with your wife and kids and enemies run into the house and you shoot them and they shoot you and your family, to them, you used your family as a shield, while your wife and kids could have been in a completely different room. This does not mean that there aren't twisted minds who wouldn't use human shields but that is beside the point being made.edit on 20-10-2010 by Zamini because: (no reason given)
This insurgent engaged a patrol of Women Marines while surrounded by kids. This wasn't some dude protecting his family
Originally posted by neo96
like i said so many times in this thread...........the topic of me has no place in this thread..myself is not up for the topic of debate...........the title of the thread is...
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by Thepreye
were done here because your opinion of me has nothing to do with this thread.
another weak argumentative tactic and run off...........:mehedit on 19-10-2010 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by aorAki
well keep your opinion about me to yourself post any opinion about the topic as you see fit......
opinion if me has nothing to do with the topic at hand just saying.......
Originally posted by neo96
peoples who put their lives on the line for this country means nothing to you that's the way it sounds..........
Originally posted by Zamini
Yes, we know the point you are making. But can you understand what point Oozy (and now me) are making? Simple yes/no. I understand that there are good soldiers as there are bad ones, but that is BESIDE the point. Sigh...why even bother, it's like you people are stuck in time.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by Equinox99
while i dont dimiss the cia's involvement in afghanistan during the 80s the statement of they are the same enemy isnt entirely accurate...thats been what 30 years ago? average afghani fighter today is what? around 18-35 possible younger and older..
fast forward to today todays mujahideen are being trained in iran and being supplied by them taking over the role of the cia of the 80s...
my arguements here are they are really not the same people same ideals but more hardlined and getting outside help much like in the 80s...
further proof of this is there was a finite supply of weapons in afghanistan and yet they have been fighting for 10 years now.
bullets,machine guns,mines,rpgs are use once and then you go buy more and contrary to the popular mythos of the cia funding the taliban today they are not
10 years of war and they are getting their supplies somewhere and oil is and drugs are fueling it.
edit on 21-10-2010 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Okay let's do the math, 18-35 years old and that was 30 years ago. So in today's standard they would be the leaders of today's youth. They would climb the ranks of their tribe and take the old leaders' places.
You can't really prove that Iran is helping them. Maybe rich folks in Iran but do you have direct links to the Iranian regime?
I don't know what kind of weapons you are thinking of.....
Originally posted by Zamini
I see how it is. You choose brute force over intellect. I'd rather sweep streets and sleep in them than join any team of mercenaries.