It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Maxpageant
reply to post by XPLodER
I think there will be an Earth-like planet for every Sun about the same size as our sun. There should also be some kind of life in other solar systems with stars not too small (inner planet) and not too big (outer planet). The universe must be teaming with life.
The fact that SETI is not picking up EM transmissions suggests to me that using EM energy to communicate is very short lived in any advanced civilization and that we will find a better way to communicate pretty soon (scalar or quantum). Perhaps civilizations are inundated with visitors attracted to EM transmissions and switch as soon as possible to reduce visibility.
Originally posted by theAymen
wow..im so impressed...i see evolution taking place...im so proud.
OP...CONCENTRATE ON ELECTROMAGNETICS....you will find your answer
im so happy...for two weeks now i have been saying this here..GRAVITY ONLY EXPLAINS A COLLISION PLUS OUR EXPLANATION OF GRAVITY IS A COLLECTION OF RESULTS, WITH A LABEL.
E&M is the reason for orbit...the sun has +- poles and the planets rotate inbetween these poles.
Originally posted by Pervius
I also believe the suns emitted Neutrino's play a part in gravity.
When we were on the moon kicking up dust how come it fell so fast with only 1/6th of Earth's gravity. When we landed on the bottom of the Marianas Trench a dust ploom raised up and for 30 minutes the guys couldn't see squat outside of their submarine/bell and had to leave. NASA says it's because of the sun, why the moon dust fell so quick. The suns emissions cause a static charge which causes atoms to attract. If the suns emissions could be blocked and you kicked up dust on the moon it would take longer before it fell. This is also likely why the asteroid belt on the outside of our planet never came together as a planet. They didn't get enough of a static charge to attract to each other.
My personal theory is it's the neutrino's causing this static charge. But it's impossible to block them to verify my theory. NASA doesn't specify what emission from the sun is causing the static charge creating "gravity", or alteast helping it a whole lot.
Our method of carbon dating uses radioactive decay to estimate the age of things. This is flawed. Neutrino emissions from the sun are not constant, and it has been found Neutrino's can speed up or slow down radioactive decay. They may be the answer for the gap you are looking for in your data.