It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DJDOHBOY
I like the "just drop 25 ICBM's" idea , somehow I think a 1 to 25 warhead ratio is a better deal
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
It was always my understanding that the 100MT thermonuclear weapon developed by the Soviet Union-now Russia-was to be able to distroy Norad, inside a solid granite moutain. It was to show that all US bases could be hit and distroyed, no matter where they were. It ment the US did not have a safe haven, anywhere in the event of nuclear war-ie the US won't servive a first strike on Russia. Smaller ICBM's could take out the cities.
Originally posted by AD5673
A 100MT nuclear bomb would kill everyone in the British Isles not just of the blast but of radiation, and it will also spread to ther close by nations like France.
Originally posted by DJDOHBOY
I like the "just drop 25 ICBM's" idea , somehow I think a 1 to 25 warhead ratio is a better deal
Originally posted by Hyperen
Originally posted by DJDOHBOY
I like the "just drop 25 ICBM's" idea , somehow I think a 1 to 25 warhead ratio is a better deal