On the Origin of The American Accent, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 38 times
Topic started on 5-9-2010 @ 02:07 PM by Nosred
America first began to be colonized by English speaking people in the 17th century. Since that time English has grown to become the de facto language of the USA. I'm sure you've noticed that Americans and Brits sound completely different. This thread will help explain why.

Part 1: Frozen in Time
When the British began to colonize North America the English accent sort of 'froze' in the colonies. So as the English accent had begun to change back in Britain, America's isolation caused our accent to change very little. Due to this, the modern American accent is closer to how Shakespeare would have sounded than the modern British accent is.

Part 2: Contact
American accents on the East Coast, and in New England especially, sound noticeably similar to the British accent than does the rest of America. Why? Because these place had more contact with England while the British accent was changing. They began to change their accents just like the British.

Part 3: Native Language
Americans adopted many words from Native American languages and languages of immigrants that had moved to America. This accounts for many of the word differences between Americans an Brits. Cookie, barbecue, rodeo, gopher, racoon, and moose are only the beginning of all the words American's had adopted from other languages.

Part 4: Americanisms
The creation of some words deemed 'Americanisms' that are often attributed to Americans were in fact first used in Britain. These words fell out of usage when the accent in England began to change, but lived on in American colonies. Trash instead of rubbish, Fall instead of Autumn, I think you get the point. Some of these words were preserved in America and eventually brought back to England. These include hire, quit, I guess, etcetera.

Part 5: Bad Grammar
The American of the past had a tendency to use nouns as verbs, such as interview, advocate, corner, and torch. These are now common parts of American English. Some words with American origin were formed by altering existing words. Some of the words created this way include sundae, phony, buddy, and pesky.




This concludes my thread on the origin of American English. Hope you learned something.


reply posted on 5-9-2010 @ 02:20 PM by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by Nosred



Well, i learned what you believe.

Anything else, for someone who might want to follow up? Links? Sources?


reply posted on 5-9-2010 @ 02:37 PM by Nosred
reply to post by youjokers



America was settled during the period that Early Modern English was used. American English is more similar to Early Modern English than British English is. Shakespeare was from the time of Early Modern English. I think you can add two and two together.

en.wikipedia.org...

[edit on 5-9-2010 by Nosred]


reply posted on 5-9-2010 @ 02:39 PM by Nosred
reply to post by kiwifoot



Yeah I meant to go more into that. Somehow I must have overlooked it though while I was writing. Oh, well.

Glad you liked it.



reply posted on 5-9-2010 @ 02:43 PM by kiwifoot
Originally posted by Nosred
reply to
post by kiwifoot



Yeah I meant to go more into that. Somehow I must have overlooked it though while I was writing. Oh, well.

Glad you liked it.


No worries, it was more of a question really!!

You're not the only one forgetting stuff, I forgot your Star n flag bro!!


reply posted on 5-9-2010 @ 02:44 PM by Nosred
reply to post by Kram09



Where did I make anything up? This is all true to my knowledge.

Yes, I did get some info from Wikipedia.


reply posted on 5-9-2010 @ 02:48 PM by Nosred
reply to post by EnlightenUp



It did evolve a lot. It's just that the way we sound is closer to how British people used to sound 300 plus years ago.

To quote Wikipedia

On the other hand, North American English has undergone some sound changes not found in other varieties of English speech:[citation needed]

The merger of /ɑ/ and /ɒ/, making father and bother rhyme.[citation needed]This change is nearly universal in North American English, occurring almost everywhere except for parts of eastern New England, hence the Boston accent.[citation needed]
The merger of /ɒ/ and /ɔ/.[citation needed] This is the so-called cot-caught merger, where cot and caught are homophones. This change has occurred in eastern New England, in Pittsburgh and surrounding areas, and from the Great Plains westward.[citation needed]
For speakers who do not merge caught and cot: The replacement of the cot vowel with the caught vowel before voiceless fricatives (as in cloth, off [which is found in some old-fashioned varieties of RP]), as well as before /ŋ/ (as in strong, long), usually in gone, often in on, and irregularly before /ɡ/ (log, hog, dog, fog [which is not found in British English at all]).
The replacement of the lot vowel with the strut vowel in most utterances of the words was, of, from, what and in many utterances of the words everybody, nobody, somebody, anybody; the word because has either /ʌ/ or /ɔ/;[7] want has normally /ɔ/ or /ɑ/, sometimes /ʌ/.[8]
Vowel merger before intervocalic /ɹ/. Which vowels are affected varies between dialects, but the Mary-marry-merry, nearer-mirror, and hurry-furry mergers are all widespread. Another such change is the laxing of /e/, /i/ and /u/ to /ɛ/, /ɪ/ and /ʊ/ before /ɹ/, causing pronunciations like [pɛɹ], [pɪɹ] and [pjʊɹ] for pair, peer and pure. The resulting sound [ʊɹ] is often further reduced to [ɝ], especially after palatals, so that cure, pure, mature and sure rhyme with fir.
Dropping of /j/ is more extensive than in RP. In most North American accents, /j/ is dropped after all alveolar and interdental consonant, so that new, duke, Tuesday, resume are pronounced /nu/, /duk/, /tuzdeɪ/, /ɹɪzum/.
æ-tensing in environments that vary widely from accent to accent; for example, for many speakers, /æ/ is approximately realized as [eə] before nasal consonants. In some accents, particularly those from Baltimore, Philadelphia, and New York City, [æ] and [eə] contrast sometimes, as in Yes, I can [kæn] vs. tin can [keən].
The flapping of intervocalic /t/ and /d/ to alveolar tap [ɾ] before unstressed vowels (as in butter, party) and syllabic /l/ (bottle), as well as at the end of a word or morpheme before any vowel (what else, whatever). Thus, for most speakers, pairs such as ladder/latter, metal/medal, and coating/coding are pronounced the same. For many speakers, this merger is incomplete and does not occur after /aɪ/; these speakers tend to pronounce writer with [əɪ] and rider with [aɪ]. This is a form of Canadian raising but, unlike more extreme forms of that process, does not affect /aʊ/. In some areas and idiolects, a phonemic distinction between what elsewhere become homophones through this process is maintained by vowel lengthening in the vowel preceding the formerly voiced consonant, e.g., [læ:·ɾɹ̩] for "ladder" as opposed to [læ·ɾɹ̩] for "latter".
Both intervocalic /nt/ and /n/ may be realized as [n] or [ɾ̃], rarely making winter and winner homophones. Most areas in which /nt/ is reduced to /n/, it is accompanied further by nasalization of simple post-vocalic /n/, so that V/nt/ and V/n/ remain phonemically distinct. In such cases, the preceding vowel becomes nasalized, and is followed in cases where the former /nt/ was present, by a distinct /n/. This stop-absorption by the preceding nasal /n/ does not occur when the second syllable is stressed, as in entail.
The pin-pen merger, by which [ɛ] is raised to [ɪ] before nasal consonants, making pairs like pen/pin homophonous. This merger originated in Southern American English but is now also sometimes found in parts of the Midwest and West as well, especially in people with roots in the mountainous areas of the Southeastern United States.


en.wikipedia.org...


reply posted on 5-9-2010 @ 02:48 PM by Kram09
reply to post by Nosred



Sorry, I didn't mean it like that.

What I mean is, is some of what you've posted some of your own theories and ideas?

Anyway it's an interesting subject nonetheless!

I gave you a star and flag.



reply posted on 5-9-2010 @ 02:51 PM by Nosred
reply to post by Kram09



That's all right. This is really just based on research I did so I guess it's not really my own theories.


reply posted on 5-9-2010 @ 02:55 PM by Nosred
reply to post by stillsearchin



That's true. Different accents for different parts of the country are caused by where the settlers came from. In Louisiana they have a more 'French' accent. People in Boston changed their accents along with the British because they had more contact with the British than other parts of the country.


reply posted on 5-9-2010 @ 03:05 PM by Tiger5
reply to post by Nosred



Well Thank you. yours has been a shaft of light in the usually gloomy and hateful place that ATS has lurched towards.

Please may we have our country back NOW

Just kidding (americanism)

Have a great day.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Know your enemy ... the Daily Mail & Viscount Rothermere
  Posted 9 days ago with 17 member flags
Gasoline Prices In Your Area.
  Posted 19 days ago with 9 member flags
Bashed teen speaks of terror
  Posted 18 days ago with 6 member flags
NBC and the Banned \'Fear Factor\' Episode
  Posted 6 days ago with 6 member flags
What are Seventh-day Adventists (SDAs) REALLY like?
  Posted 9 days ago with 5 member flags