It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DISRAELI
reply to post by Greatest I am
Do you think it is immoral that babies should allow their parents to carry them around?
Just because babies don't have the power of walking?
Originally posted by HarvestMoon
reply to post by Greatest I am
I understand what you're saying, but the way you describe it is different from the actual nature of Jesus' sacrifice. Jesus is not a separate entity from God or just a "victim," he is God's son, and part of God himself. So when God accepted Jesus' punishment in place of ours, in a way he was taking the punishment for our sins himself. I don't think you can say there is anything immoral about taking the place of someone who wronged you, or forgiving someone of their debt to you.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Okay OP. you've presented a stinging prosecution. Now it's time for the defense to present it's case before the jury. Are you willing to do what you've asked us all to do and watch the defense's arguments?
Why did Jesus come to Earth?
Jesus died in our place.
Jesus died to crush our enemies.
Jesus took our wrath.
Originally posted by slymattb
It Seams to me that you forget what Jesus sacrifice was for. And if you trying to prove that Christianity is wrong this is a weak way to prove it.
Originally posted by babloyi
Actually I kinda agree with your premise (although I haven't checked any of your links, sorry ).
This is one of the major problems I have with Christianity, and one that is the reason I am not a Christian today (at least in the traditional sense of Christianity).
Some people may bring up "the Crusades", or "Christians are against evolution", or "Christianity is against science", but these are all side issues, and not relevant to the core of Christianity.
I find the very core of (traditional) Christian thought to be theologically (and otherwise) illogical:
Why should MY sins, MY mistakes be the responsibility of ANYONE other than MYSELF? How can I morally toss them off and hand them to a completely innocent bystander, a third party, who I have so much respect for? Considering how much Christ was supposed to have suffered during the Passion, *I* do not want to have to add MY burden on that as well.
Well, that, and the concept of the Original Sin.
[edit on 25-8-2010 by babloyi]
It is up to the victim of sin to forgive that sin when possible as in the Hebrew customs of which the Bible is based on.
Once forgiven for that sin by the victim, God has no role to play.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Greatest I am
It is up to the victim of sin to forgive that sin when possible as in the Hebrew customs of which the Bible is based on.
Once forgiven for that sin by the victim, God has no role to play.
Really? "No role"? But Psalms states we sin against God and Him alone:
"Against thee, thee only, have I sinned, and done evil in thy sight: that thou mightest be justified when thou speakest, be clear when thou judgest." Psalms 51:4
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Greatest I am
He is the author of the commands we violate when we sin.
We may hurt our fellow man, but we only sin against God.