It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by neo96
.......congress cannont be prosecuted for what it says in congress...........
They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
Originally posted by Justoneman
reply to post by Tyrannyispeace
And until he was shot and became an Alzhiemer patient, Reagan held to it.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by mothershipzeta
Reagan talked the good talk, but he was horrible at walking the walk.
Originally posted by MidnightDStroyer
Most of their felony offenses (any violation of the Constitution is automatically a felony-level offense!) are a matter of public record!
Of course, when finding evidence for Treason, we have to abide by the Constitutional definition, as written in Article 3, Section 3, Clause 1:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
When the Federal Government is "giving aid & comfort" to the foreign invaders of Arizona (AZ had to give up geographical territory to the invaders!)...That sounds like Treason to me!
Even if anyone who attempts this is too late before they head back to D.C., there's always the option of setting up for Special Election with Recall on the ballot...
At least this way, we don't have to wait for the regular elections cycles to throw the bums out of our offices!
Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by maybereal11
Your post makes zero sense what-so-ever.
You attack him for being a news analyst?
Yet you agree with his analysis?
What?
I'm having a hard time understanding why you even commented or how you want me to respond to that.
[edit on 10-8-2010 by mnemeth1]
Is a Former Judge Still "The Honorable"?
Dear Robert,
I have a question regarding a former district court judge (in New Hampshire) that has returned to private practice. Would this person still be called "The Hon.," or would that be inappropriate because of his new role?
--- Mark in New Hampshire
Hi Mark
The rule is "once The Honorable, always The Honorable."
So, address the official envelope:
The Honorable (full name)
(Name of Firm)
Address
Retired judges are usually addressed in conversation as "Judge (surname)"
However this judge might not be using "judge" as an honorific. A judge who has returned to private practice would be addressed as "Mr. (surname)" professionally. That way he would not be addressed as "Judge (surname)" in court in the presence of the presiding judge!
But that said ... friends might orally address him as Judge (surname) socially.
We have a tradition in the US of using only one 'honorific" at a time. E.g., an Navy Captain who is a Doctor, might be addressed as "Captain (surname)" when he is your commanding officer, and as "Dr. (surname)" when he is examining your injured foot. But he is never "Captain Dr." or "Dr. Captain."
-- Robert Hickey
Originally posted by links234
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by Ghost of Chewie
Oh yeah..... Politicians dont follow the Constitution... Thats why their politicians.
then they need to be fired
and tried as traitors
That's right! No thoughtcrime!
Severe punishment for those we disagree with.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
I so wished the Judge would run for a high fed political office.
I have the judge on my political dream team with Ron Paul
as President and the Judge as VP.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by hawaiinguy12
Originally posted by SeventhSeal
This guy is a tool bag. Love when Bush was president, he had no problems once so ever. God forbid a Liberal (oooo not the L word) is now in the white house and he's having a heart attack over it.
Funny how most conservatives want to bone the Constitution and pretend they're Constitutionalists...but yet, some of them want to modify the 14th Amendment?
Hypocrisy from the right for sure.
Did you even bother watching the video? Doubtful Do you even know anything about this guy besides what you read or hear on the TV set? Nope. Are you a total and utter moron? Yes
Case Closed,you failed with your fraud logic and not so strong argument. Typical liberal scum