It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The stained, brown water seen washing up in pockets along Alabama beaches for the last two weeks appears to contain the dispersant widely used on oil from the Deepwater Horizon spill, according to a preliminary analysis.
Ed Overton, a Louisiana State University chemist… [who] is analyzing oil samples for the federal government… said… “indications [are] that there was a dispersant signal in the sample.” … [T]he signal was similar to a Corexit sample.
Harriet Perry, a scientist at the Gulf Coast Research Lab in Ocean Springs [said]… “It looks like they found [COrexit],” Perry said of work by research colleagues at Tulane University [researching crab larvae]… “For a droplet to be that small, it has to be dispersed oil… It’s supposed to biodegrade rapidly. It’s supposed to disappear in days, not weeks, but that may not be happening.”
While heavy oil sheen was visible in the areas where the material was collected, little if any oil was found to be present in the samples, said Overton, who is analyzing oil samples for the federal government. "We didn't see oil in the analysis we do, but I passed some of these water samples to a colleague who does fluorescence analysis," Overton said. "We saw some preliminary indications that there was a dispersant signal in the sample."
At some locations, the brown material was present from the surface to the sea floor. At other locations, the brown material was in a layer in the bottom 5 feet of the water column. At those sites, another material -- stringy, milky yellow filaments the thickness of a human hair -- formed a layer above the brown material. Overton said the filaments appeared biological in nature and might be the remnants of bacteria that consumed oil.
Why was the EPa and the global community told that corexit dissolves in days and yet we now have it showing up in the marshlands and seashores weeks and even months later?
Originally posted by antar
, August 6, 2010:
The stained, brown water seen washing up in pockets along Alabama beaches for the last two weeks appears to contain the dispersant widely used on oil from the Deepwater Horizon spill, according to a preliminary analysis.
Ed Overton, a Louisiana State University chemist… [who] is analyzing oil samples for the federal government… said… “indications [are] that there was a dispersant signal in the sample.” … [T]he signal was similar to a Corexit sample.
Harriet Perry, a scientist at the Gulf Coast Research Lab in Ocean Springs [said]… “It looks like they found [COrexit],” Perry said of work by research colleagues at Tulane University [researching crab larvae]… “For a droplet to be that small, it has to be dispersed oil… It’s supposed to biodegrade rapidly. It’s supposed to disappear in days, not weeks, but that may not be happening.”
www.floridaoilspilllaw.com...
Is this what the "Blobs" of gasoline type substance will prove to be if allowed to be properly analyzed? Will the responsible parties even allow outside labs to conduct the work or will it be once again something exclusive to BP staff only?
Why was the EPa and the global community told that corexit dissolves in days and yet we now have it showing up in the marshlands and seashores weeks and even months later?
is it possible that when it was tested in the labs who created it they were not prepared for it to be mixed with many other natural occurring elements such as the dangerous methane, and others?
How long can the incompetence be allowed before we Americans watch as our shores are invaded by the United Nations groups to avert a potential catastrophic incident which will reach to every shore on the globe?
The portion about bioaccumulation and carcinogenic effect is interesting, considering Nalco’s own Dr. David Horsup stated in a media advisory that “additional testing” is needed in order to assess “biodegradation, bioaccumulation, carcinogenicity and effectiveness.”
“Though all dispersants are potentially dangerous when applied in such volumes, Corexit [9500] is particularly toxic,” she wrote. “It contains petroleum solvents and a chemical that, when ingested, ruptures red blood cells and causes internal bleeding. It is also bioaccumulative, meaning its concentration intensifies as it moves up the food chain.”
Nalco's own Dr. David Horsup stated in a media advisory that "additional testing" is needed in order to assess "biodegradation, bioaccumulation, carcinogenicity and effectiveness."
Originally posted by Chris McGee
reply to post by Redwookieaz
Nothing you've written there contradicts what I have said. An independent French institute performed tests on this stuff and they found that 78% degraded within 28 days. The information I posted regarding the dispersal action speeding up the biodegradation of the oil is a fact.
I made no claims as to the toxicity of the substance and didn't 'stick up' for anyone at all. I just posted two simple facts which makes your hostile reaction a little puzzling.