Apollo 10 gets Glimpse of an Extra-Terrestrial Monolith in Space, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 9-2-2005 @ 03:08 PM by stargazernate
Yep, some of those astronauts have a great sense of humor...



reply posted on 22-10-2007 @ 04:08 PM by anhinga
...strange thread from over a year ago, I'm still in these Alien/Ufo archives and see about 100 pages of threads yet to go, had to space this out more.... anyway, says people get cancer from being near the thing and some die? It's underwater around the Bahamas -- all of it, I can totally believe.

This is why 'disclosure' seems odd to me, *they* spend countless dollars on movies, some friendly, some not -- to gauge public reaction? I think so. . . .

. . .. does that mean there's unfriendly ET out there? Maybe and what if there's a Star Wars like galaxy out there? W/ people like us and less like ET laughing at us cruising around in spacecraft? Never know.

Back to the point -- should it be this or that way, the countless threads about a spotted Ufo, realizing how much time people put into looking at something that can't really be proven true or false -- isn't this the infamous "false flag" invasion? Like everyday? I refuse to open Ufo stuff unless the headline is catchy beyond belief, it's pointless, boring and a waste of time personally.

ATS should break up Aliens/Ufo -- maybe people would go through all these threads more often if it was divided into categories a little more directed to ONE specific topic. Otherwise, like this thread, right off the bat, they were "no way" to the OP without even questioning any of it, I see how there's dumb-downed middle America w/ some technology, but after awhile on various threads -- I can't stomach the negativity.


reply posted on 26-9-2008 @ 04:32 AM by timelike
reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com



Your formula is utter rubbish. I'm a theoretical physicist working in Quantum field theory in Curved spacetime. You say is an expectation value. What vacuum are you using? If you put a field into a curved spacetime there is no one preferred vauum- the vacuum depends entirely on the situation. So are you talking about a Unruh Vacuum, a Boulware Vacuum a Hawking-Hartle Vauum or what?

Moreover your comment " represents the particle's density of the ground state in the non-realtivistic " is also nonsensical- why wpould you be working with particles not fields?

One final point, how could Gagarin see this object on the Moon? He only went in orbit around the Earth. To see it on the Moon it would have to be massive- far to large for a retrieval in the 70s!


reply posted on 20-5-2009 @ 06:18 PM by SkepticPerhaps
reply to post by shrike2000



Funny... the opposite approach is what you debunkers always use isn't it? That if they were so good at covering things up, why would leaked documents and photos ever get out? Gimme a break, it's nice you take things with skepticism, but don't outright debunk something for superficial theories.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 7 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 15 days ago with 60 member flags
New UFO footage from my hometown
  Posted 19 days ago with 34 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 10 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 17 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 1 days ago with 23 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Alien Grey caught in photo ?
  Aliens and UFOs, Posted 9 hours ago, 64 replies
Greetings from a Dying Man
  Introductions, Posted 7 hours ago, 62 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 13 hours ago, 55 replies
Iran sent pink drone to Obama
  World War Three, Posted 14 hours ago, 40 replies