 Originally posted by bigredenquirer
There is surely no merit in this post. Surely you could have at least come up with something more original than a monolith? Come on... 
um, how can you say that? didn't we send a monolith out in space? And no one saw that in telescopes. When you really think about it, it's not that
hard to believe.
Edit: I'm trying to start a good argument on this.
Here's pics of this suposed monolith:
galactic2.net...
galactic2.net...
Here's the webpage were found the photo's
galactic2.net...
[edit on 9-2-2005 by malakiem]
|
The monlith story is deeply unoriginal, and there is no supporting evidence, at least there is none presented here.
I'm afraid I can't make anything out of those photos, they seem to have been enlarged greatly and I have no idea about their provenance. It could
just be fluff on the lense for all I can make out.
I can't read the Dutch(?) from the site, so I've no idea what they are going on about.
|
Yep, some of those astronauts have a great sense of humor...
|
Originally posted by Jonna
It brings up an interesting idea though. If the best place to hide something is in plain sight, then why not make a movie about it and then anyone
attempting to come forward with secret information will be seen as a nut-job who saw the movie one too many times.
Darth Vader is after me! I swear! 
whear can i get monolith vidio
|
I agree that the lack of originality in the story here is truly distressing, as well as the quality of the photographic material used to back it up.
Very disappointing. Better stories were told in 1950's alien invasion movies, and I've seen better looking images on toilet paper.
But I guess this is what happens when people use a story's similarity to some other dubious story or work of "fiction" as a kind of odd proof of
its truth. Like if I made up a story about an ET blob that devours living flesh, some would say, "It's just like that Steven McQueen movie, so it
must be true! The movie was just a cover to hide the fact that a real Blob did land and kill a lot of people in a small California town, and the
government hushed it up!"
Can't somebody for once put some real effort into one of these stories and come up with something a bit more unique and entertaining? Something
other than just endlessly recycled nonsense?
Oh, I forgot. I'm on the Internet. The place where nonsense goes to be endlessly rehashed.
|
Originally posted by beyondSciFi
Originally posted by AboveTopSecret.com
U.S.
Government's old gravity-control formula:
phi(x) =<0lphi(x) l0 > + &phi(x), where <0lphi(x)l0>
is the vacuum expectation value, and m2^<0lphi(x)l0>^2 represents
the particle's density of the ground state in the non-realtivistic
limit. The action of this field in the presence of gravity is...intrinsic
gravitational cosmological constant Lambda/ 8piG receives a contribution
(1/2) m2^<0lphi(x)l0>^2
Can any who know physics really well tell me if this really makes any sense?
[edit on 6-2-2005 by beyondSciFi]
hi im a prof. of physics at omaga tech indiana theoreticaly this formula could work given that you could find an enclosed air tight area where pi is
at a factor of 7.36 such a place would need to be cooled down to 8*c and you would need a large thermal constrictor which has the same sucseaden force
as an atom bomb but if pi is miss callculated by as much as 0.1 you would in fact create the exact opposit of zero g and would have a force intence
enougth to crush the human body
|
...strange thread from over a year ago, I'm still in these Alien/Ufo archives and see about 100 pages of threads yet to go, had to space this out
more.... anyway, says people get cancer from being near the thing and some die? It's underwater around the Bahamas -- all of it, I can totally
believe.
This is why 'disclosure' seems odd to me, *they* spend countless dollars on movies, some friendly, some not -- to gauge public reaction? I think
so. . . .
. . .. does that mean there's unfriendly ET out there? Maybe and what if there's a Star Wars like galaxy out there? W/ people like us and less
like ET laughing at us cruising around in spacecraft? Never know.
Back to the point -- should it be this or that way, the countless threads about a spotted Ufo, realizing how much time people put into looking at
something that can't really be proven true or false -- isn't this the infamous "false flag" invasion? Like everyday? I refuse to open Ufo stuff
unless the headline is catchy beyond belief, it's pointless, boring and a waste of time personally.
ATS should break up Aliens/Ufo -- maybe people would go through all these threads more often if it was divided into categories a little more directed
to ONE specific topic. Otherwise, like this thread, right off the bat, they were "no way" to the OP without even questioning any of it, I see how
there's dumb-downed middle America w/ some technology, but after awhile on various threads -- I can't stomach the negativity.
|
