reply posted on 6-2-2005 @ 12:18 PM by gl2
Boylan's source, Dr. Michael Wolf, said the monolith wasn't a flat, tabloid like object, but was poylhedral--more diamond shaped. He also suggested
that Arthur C. Clarke was in the know, through a community of associates, about the so-called monolith. Whether or not it was captured and placed in
Abaco (another report said the Hughes corp. built the Abaco site, which was supposedly later run by RCA--a Mellon family corp... Mellons were closely
involved in Hughes doings), I can't say.
I do know that if there were such a device it would be powered by electrogravity. See Tom Bearden's writings about electrogravity. Electrogravity is
marginally faster than light, and, depending on how it is focused and integrated, it can accelerate toward infinity--and is the basis for alien disk
"flight." The problem is that electrogravity speeds the flow of time in one part of space-time to slow it in the electrogravity "focus," as Bob
Lazar writes also. Speed time and it causes a gradiant, which can be navigated to do faster-than-light translocations, of course.
But if you speed the flow of time on your gene structure, you can age it prematurely, mutate it and shorten the telomeres, of course. So, if a
"monolith" was captured, to stand next to it would be suicidal. If it were, indeed, used to do communications and more over an entire planet, the
energy would be dangerous to stand near. Bearden calls the speeding of time delta (symbol) t, and re-writes Einstein to read E=delta t c2. That's
Energy = the change of time times the speed of light squared. In other words, mass is interchangable with delta t. That also implies that
electrogravity isn't entirely "free." Instead, it ever so slightly shortens the life of this universe cycle and could more noticably shorten the
life of our sun, if used unecologically. That appears to be the main alien theme, to date.
Finally, aliens won't be communicating with radar and light waves. Instead, they go off-spectrum with electrogravity, which can be bent back into
light waves. As Bearden says, destructive interference of light waves in three dimensions (when light waves converge from opposite directions along
three different axes and cancel out) bleeds into electrogravity, AND CONVERSELY, destructive interference of electrogravity bleeds back into light
waves. Light and electrogravity are reciprocals of each other, interchangeable--if you maneuver them correctly. All you have to do is vary the
potential to effect either. So, faster than light communications are easy with electrogravity, but it can be "decoded" to be read by destructively
interfering the electrogravity in order to capture the message on a simple computer. That's why aliens aren't beaming us their re-runs of old TV
series (just a joke). Instead, they are saturating our airspace with electrogravity signal.
See the January 2000 Scientific American article on electrogravity (also known as "negative energy") called "Negative Energy, Wormholes and Warp
Drive" by two PhDs, one of whom studied under Einstein's co-author of electromagnetic field theory, the other of whom studied under John Archibald
Wheeler, Richard Feynman's famous co-author. Negative energy is actually produced by converging lasers and is the basis for dark states, Bose
Einstein condensates, the "freezing" (delta t) of light to a standstill, and more.
[edit on 6-2-2005 by gl2]
[edit on 6-2-2005 by gl2]
