It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by joechip
reply to post by whatukno
Looks like you buy the lie. Have you never heard of government agent provocateurs? Here's a little info on what really went down.
www.globalresearch.ca...
Open your mind a little.
Originally posted by whatukno
Ok, fine, whatever. It's my belief that Anarchy is a stupid pathetic system
Originally posted by whatukno
Ok, fine, whatever. It's my belief that Anarchy is a stupid pathetic system that will never ever work in society, by virtue of the fact that anarchy is anti society.
But believe whatever you want, when these right wing idiots that want to start a violent revolution finally snap and do something, don't come crying to me when you are in their gun sights too.
Don't come crying to me if society completely collapses into anarchy and it's not all fun, games and rainbows like you think it will be.
Originally posted by joechip
reply to post by NoHierarchy
I read your previous posts on the subject and it seems you do know of what you speak, however, the video in my link does contain a news report where the Quebec Provincial Police ADMIT such provocation...at least admit that three men, clearly provoking violence were indeed policemen. This was Montebello 2007, and not the recent events...the evidence there was more circumstantial and based mostly on similar footwear.
Nonetheless, my earlier response did imply that such tactics were largely a media fiction based on provocateurs and the television footage of such. I stand corrected. I think that does happen and it makes sense that the government and media would use such tactics, but I'm not informed enough to make such a sweeping assertion. A rare treat, I've learned something this evening. Thanks.
edit to add: A question for you; do you believe the appearance (and occasional admission) of police provocateurs is disinfo to declaw, so to speak, the actual tactics of black bloc anarchists...seems a little weak on the face of it--I haven't actually read that you believe that, mind you, I'm just asking your opinion.
[edit on 27-8-2010 by joechip]
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by joechip
But the reason why we lived like that for so long is not very encouraging. It was because we had no choice, we had to work full time just to get food. We were literally physically enslaved to labor like a bunch of animals. And the consequences of it were severe. No education, no health care, no freedom of speech etc etc. I am not sure if people have that in mind when they talk about anarchy.
The "natural" state of humans involves a lot of suffering. You say modern society is stressful, but I think it is more stressful to not know if there is enough food to get through the winter. Or that the neighboring tribe will attack. Or you will die of a cold..
Originally posted by joechip
reply to post by -PLB-
Wow. Is no one on these forums capable of admitting when they are wrong about an issue?
And I'm not talking about your opinions, likes and dislikes, etc. I'm talking about the actual discourse, where you make an incorrect, uninformed claim about hunter-gatherer society, I refute it with evidence, and you respond with "the exception proves the rule," huh? What exception? We're talking about the way ALL humans lived for the vast majority of our time on the planet. Not starving, not working as much as modern man does, living as long or longer, and not having or needing the hierarchical control mechanisms that define the modern world.
edit to remove nonessentials....
[edit on 28-8-2010 by joechip]
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by joechip
Maybe I was wrong about the amount of labor, but I think my general point still stands. Compared to our standards that kind of life it is not preferable at all. In many areas it was harsh for those people. I think the fact that nobody chooses for that kind of life proves that point. Besides, it only works with very small populations. An interesting question is how they achieved population control. All in all I just don't think that this is what what most anarchists have in mind. If it is then the question remains, whats stopping you.
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by NoHierarchy
You are right that in many parts in the world people would be better of if they lived in such tribes, but I won't go as far as to say that even people in a western society would be better off. Some people will prefer it, but I think most wont. I understand there are difficulties to start living like that, but those difficulties are not primarily caused by our current society not allowing it. It seems to me the main reason is that such a life just isn't easy, and you will have to give up a lot of benefits that we take for granted nowadays. You will also have a hard time finding enough people who agree to live with you like that. Still, its not impossible.
As for the population control, I must say I haven't studied it that well yet, but some articles I read so far say that the population remained small in size because of the huge amount of child deaths. I think for a modern tribe population control would also be a huge problem.