It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hooper
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by TrickoftheShade
What if the evidence implicates Israel? Is such evidence to be considered anti-semitic, or is just the reading of the evidence to be considered such?
Really? All of Israel? Here's the question what if there is no evidence and then you make something up that you hope "implicates Israel" will you admit that is anti-semitic? (And please, I don't need anthropology lectures about who and who is not semitic - we all know the popular connotation of the word).
Originally posted by Game_Over
"Are those in the TM worried about becoming unwitting agents of anti-semitism? "
-- Just as much as trusters should be worried about becoming unwitting agents of Israel.
I noticed between the Bill Clinton thread you started though and this one that you are attempting to develop a style of thread creation that appears to be about genuine concern for the 911 truth but you then twist it for a cheap set up.
But look how many replies you get. Look how many people fall for it besides valermia and goodoldave. Its actually quite interesting though. Thanks for the laughs.