It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Originally posted by Nutter
Remember that I myself am a foresics engineer
I doubt that very seriously.
Originally posted by Nutter
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Originally posted by Nutter
Remember that I myself am a foresics engineer
I doubt that very seriously.
Who's being incredulous now? I wonder?
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
The biggest error is your complaining about the building codes that NIST produced, etc.
Originally posted by Nutter
BTW. If Quintiere is correct and NIST is wrong, how does that change the codes propossed by NIST? Which affects us all.
Any and every person involved with structural engineering should know that NIST merely makes recs. And anybody claiming to be a forensics structural engineer would damn sure know that.
Therefore, you are lying.
But since your talking points have been easily shown to be illogical, please continue the discussion.
The major finding of the NIST report is that the design and construction materials of the World Trade Center did not contribute to the disaster; they performed exceptionally well. Despite this fact, the report offers several recommendations that are not supported by the investigation, nor are they backed by substantive research. In fact, the premises of some of the statements appear to be in error.
The recommendations in the NIST report are useful guidelines towards that end. Howere, the AIA believes that at times the recommendations overlook measures and technologies that are already in practice, or go in directions that are not supported by either the investigation or scientific reasearch.
The American Institute of Architects represents more than 75,000 licensed architects, emerging professionals, and allied partners
Originally posted by Nutter
The codes that NIST came up with are bogus when considering a structural collapse. Why not change codes that really matter rather than having a new fire exit and wider exit stairs?
Originally posted by Nutter
Let's see what the AIA has to say about the code changes recommended by NIST.
Looks Dr. Quintiere and myself are not the only ones who believe NIST to be in error.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
The section that follows your quote does not deal with the actual codes, but who determines what codes will be used in the building.
At this point, nothing but a statement from a moderator confirming that you are as you say will convince me that you're nothing more than a typical truther.
Which, as I also pinted out, is at odds internally, and you have ignored. Namely, you cannot say that you trust a guv appointed review board, provide evidence that NIST is peer reviewed..... and also complain that NIST needs to be peer reviewed, and that you personally want to see the peer review and accuse NIST of "secrecy".
APPENDIX E
USE OF COMPUTER MODELS
This appendix gives guidance regarding qualifications and information that should be provided when undertaking computer modeling. More specifically, the appendix requests that computer program data be submitted as part of the documentation.
As i said, it's all just a ploy to make your request seem more respectable, when in reality you're not being consistent.
Originally posted by Nutter
What could possibly be in the data that would be a public safety issue?
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
That's expected of someone masquerading as a forensics structural engineer though.
Originally posted by rival
"The only conclusion that's feasible is that this report contains information
usable to effect the destruction of other buildings, and as such, this
information is classified from public exposure so that it doesn't fall into
the wrong hands."
"However implausible it may be that a terror organization could use
this information to start fires at key structural points in a building
to effect its demolition, this is the tacit implication."
If anyone could add to the possible reasons for NIST's decision to classify their research in this regard, I would be very interested.
It certainly isn't that they are worried about other professionals not working with them in the future due to the release of their models AND because of their not cooperating with future investigations THIS would make releasing these models "a public safety issue", as the previous poster proposed
IDK Hooper, Other than Rival and you, no one seems to have any idea what the "public safety issue" could be. It's not a easy question to answer, and a seemingly strange response for NIST to make in regards to the denial of computer models of collapses the whole world has seen.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has received requests made under the Federal Freedom of Information Act (Title 5 U.S.C. 552) (FOIA) for the photographs and videos NIST collected as part of its investigation of the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers (Buildings 1 and 2) and World Trade Center Building 7. The FOIA requests are located at: wtc.nist.gov... FOIArequests09_15_42_63_88.pdf. During the course of its investigation NIST received thousands of photographic and video images from hundreds of photographers.
Under the FOIA, the Government is required to release to a requester copies of documents it maintains that are not otherwise protected by an exemption to the FOIA. One particular exemption, exemption (b)(4), protects from disclosure any records, or portions thereof, which contain ‘‘trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential.’’ 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4).
If you submitted photographic or video images to NIST for its World Trade Center investigation and if you believe that some or all of the images should be withheld, you must notify NIST in writing within ten (10) working days (i.e., excluding Saturday, Sunday, and legal public holidays) from the date of publication of this Federal Register notice. Your written response must specifically identify which images you submitted to NIST for which you are asserting privilege under exemption (b)(4). You should include copies of your images with your written response to help identify your images. If you do not positively identify your image(s), your written response will not be considered. Your written response must indicate that you are responding to this
"Protects from disclosure any records, or portions thereof, which contain ‘‘trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential.’’