For the first time a direct evidence of the rapid breaking of The Gulf Stream!

Strange.
The maps from 1 year ago show the same terrible thing happening. I wonder what caused it then. Maybe it's just something that has to do with summer.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/569c6db5c5b4.gif[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/4d6aed71c0c6.gif[/atsimg]

[edit on 7/15/2010 by Phage]

This link about the Gulf Stream and its crucial (vital) importance for all of us and for Countries as England, Ireland, Iceland, Greenland, France, Portugal, Spain, all the Scandinavian peninsula and the central Europe.
en.wikipedia.org...

reply to post by Phage


Sir: have you counterfeited (hoaxed) the images?

reply to post by Arken

Are you accusing me of doing so?
Before you do you should do some research.
www.wunderground.com...




[edit on 7/15/2010 by Phage]

reply to post by Phage


Where do you have taken those images of July 2009?
Show us the source, or, better the direct link,...please...Sir.

Originally posted by Phage
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/4d6aed71c0c6.gif[/atsimg]

[edit on 7/15/2010 by Phage]

Please, provide the direct link of this image, Sir. Thanks

you can generate a map here: Gulf of Mexico Near Real-Time Altimeter Viewer

reply to post by Arken

So you do think I edited the image. I'll remember that.
argo.colorado.edu...

Something else to note here.. in the document cited in the OP, the last paragraph states:

Acknowledgements: we acknowledge Frascati National Laboratories
(www.lnf.infn.it) and the National Institute of Nuclear Physics (www.infn.it).
We also aknowledge the University of Colorado, Boulder, USA: the maps
displayed in Fig. 1 and 2 were produced by the Colorado Center for
Astrodynamics Research at the University of Colorado, Boulder, USA. More
information on these data products is available at
argo.colorado.edu...

which is, incidentally, the same site that Phage and I referenced in our links.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Arken

 

So you do think I edited the image. I'll remember that.
argo.colorado.edu...

It's a menace Sir?

Why I can't ask you where do you have taken directly (the link) those images?

And if your, it is a menace, what are the conseguence? May I ask you this, Sir?

reply to post by Arken

I guess you mean a "threat".
No. It's not a threat. It's an indication that in the future I will keep your accusation toward me in mind and it will affect my attitude toward you. I don't like being called a liar.

Sir: have you counterfeited (hoaxed) the images?

As has been pointed out, the source of the images I posted was provided in the article of your OP. If you had been more careful you may have noticed that and looked for yourself.

in my humble opinion if the data is read properly then these current rotations should contain a proportion of the oil in the gulf itself. apparently there is a skimmer near singapore that could suck up more in a day than what has been accomplished up to now. my source? max keiser on rttv today friday. as i stated in my initial reply this could make other organisations very wealthy if they waited just outside international waters if the oil leached into the conveyer and moved up towards canada etc. i guess ownership is not a problem regarding the oil if it reaches international waters as i feel it would be deemed 'abandoned'. ok who wants to chip in toward the cost of a tanker or twenty, all crew and kit and tap up lord dyson for some assistance? in me dreams!

reply to post by Phage


Apologize me if you think that, but my knowledge of Gov. or Mil. sites is really poor. In the OP pdf. page that I've found there wasn't the direct link of those images. I thought that they were images with restrictions to the public.
Then sorry Sir.

Oh, however what is your opinion about the Breakdown of The Gulf Stream? Even "the summer"?

reply to post by Arken

Oh. Hi Imagir. I didn't recognize you at first.
It isn't a government or military website, it is a university. The pdf you posted has a direct link to the site.

There is no "breakdown" of the Gulf Stream. It is doing what it always has done, as the links I showed you before demonstrate. In case you missed those, here is another.
oceanexplorer.noaa.gov...

[edit on 7/15/2010 by Phage]

reply to post by Phage


You are right again, Phage.
The link in pdf. page is black and not blue as usual.

This was debunked on Phage's first post - No insult intended to the OP - it was an honest mistake.

I just followed the thread until Phage so gracefully went for the kill. I've seen this before.

He's an animal.

I wish I could eat lightning bolts.

reply to post by Arken

Yeah I loved the movie "Day after Tomorrow"
Don't you think it is just a bit premature to believe that the oil is gonna shut down the conveyor?

Oh I see the Phagemonster has killed this thread ''


[edit on 15-7-2010 by Lil Drummerboy]

I don't know for sure what is being compared by the different graphs/maps here and I'm sure that Phage is right on this being a yearly cycle. But I want to know if the pdf is a legitimate source, because this said:

Frascati National Laboratories (LNF) - National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN)
Frascati 00044, Via E. Fermi, 40, ITALY...


The latest real time satellite (Jason, Topex/Poseidon, Geosat
Follow-On, ERS-2, Envisat) data maps of May-June 2010 processed by CCAR1,2
(Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research), checked at Frascati
Laboratories by the means of the SHT congruent calculus3 and compared with
past years data, show for the first time a direct evidence of the rapid breaking
of the Loop Current, a warm ocean current, crucial part of the Gulf Stream.

First presuming this is really from this site: www.lnf.infn.it... I'm not sure they make alot of errors in their calculations. And they seem to be saying that they have compared the data from past years (which should mean that all yearly cycles that occur would be taken into account, wouldn't it? you would assume this anyway), and that this is different.


Providing the document came from the source mentioned, these are the words that concern me: checked at Frascati Laboratories by the means of the SHT congruent calculus3 and compared with past years data




[edit on 5-8-2010 by Unity_99]

To me, you could show me many similar graphs and it would be impressive but I don't understand the differences between them well, and did not like graphs in school. What I'm more concerned with the authenticity of the pdf, because if they did their calculations, as they said they did, taking in account the data over the past years, like they said they did, then the slow down or summer loop would have been calculated in already, but they're findings say that this is different.

what i don't get, is why back east is baking now as well as europe and russia. maybe it's el nino?