It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

More Evidence Einstein Was Wrong

page: 5
9
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 04:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by Gentill Abdulla
 


nothing can't bend.



I wouldn't say that. You are the perfect example of something/someone that doesn't bend.
No proof bends your "beliefs".




posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 04:50 PM
link   
reply to post by Chamberf=6
 


If you believe in maxwell's equations and kirchhoff's rules, then you believe in plasma cosmology.

Maxwell's and Kirchhoff's rules prohibit "frozen-in" magnetic fields from forming in a plasma, which means charged plasma must obey circuit laws, which means electrical currents flow in space plasma.

To deny plasma cosmology means you deny the known laws of physics governing electricity.



posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 04:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by mnemeth1

Originally posted by Gentill Abdulla
reply to post by Chamberf=6
 


Oh yeah! I guess it's okay that gravity doesn't exist now because some guy from the internet told me so huh?


neutron stars made out of fictional matter that spin around on their axis 67,000 times per minute don't exist.



This "fictional matter" has been under observation and complies with the laws of physics.

The thing that makes it rotate is called angular momentum. You see as a star dies it's NUCLEAR core cools down. This causes GRAVITY to take over and makes the star smaller.

When the star gets smaller it's momentum would have to be conserved as it gets smaller.

This momentum can only be conserved by the star increasing speed as it decreases in size. Both due to gravity and angular momentum.

[edit on 8-7-2010 by Gentill Abdulla]



posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 04:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Chamberf=6
 


Nothing can't bend.

Space is nothing.

If you claim space bends, then you are claiming space is something more than nothing.



posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 04:51 PM
link   
reply to post by mnemeth1
 


No, I do not believe in plasma cosmology.


And yes I think space can bend. And no I don't think space is just "nothing".

Anything else you want to tell me I think??



Nothing can't bend


So are you calling your beliefs "nothing"?
Lol couldn't resist.


[edit on 8/7/2010 by Chamberf=6]



posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 04:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by Gentill Abdulla
 


nothing can't bend.



Spacetime is a 4-d manifold.

I don't think that classifies as nothing.



posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 04:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Gentill Abdulla
 


If you want to believe there are stars made of hypothetical matter that spin around on their axis 67,000 times per minute, be my guest.

The theory is totally absurd.



posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 04:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gentill Abdulla

Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by Gentill Abdulla
 


nothing can't bend.



Spacetime is a 4-d manifold.

I don't think that classifies as nothing.


It classifies as numbers on a piece of paper.



[edit on 8-7-2010 by mnemeth1]



posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 04:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by Gentill Abdulla
 


If you want to believe there are stars made of hypothetical matter that spin around on their axis 67,000 times per minute, be my guest.

The theory is totally absurd.



If you want to believe that saturn is a brown dwarf from another star AND say it's a planet then be my guest.

Electric universe theory is totally absurd.



posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 04:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by mnemeth1

Originally posted by Gentill Abdulla

Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by Gentill Abdulla
 


nothing can't bend.



Spacetime is a 4-d manifold.

I don't think that classifies as nothing.


It classifies as numbers on a piece of paper.



[edit on 8-7-2010 by mnemeth1]


Though we can't see the continuum here is my definition of it.

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 05:00 PM
link   
I would still like to know how Saturn, being both a planet and a brown dwarf (as you said), just wanders about the galaxy.
I would also like to know how Saturn can be both, besides you just saying "yes it can".
And do you think that a brown dwarf is formed without any affects from gravity in your view?
If so, how? Let me guess, electricity.


[edit on 8/7/2010 by Chamberf=6]



posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 05:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gentill Abdulla

Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by Gentill Abdulla
 


If you want to believe there are stars made of hypothetical matter that spin around on their axis 67,000 times per minute, be my guest.

The theory is totally absurd.



If you want to believe that saturn is a brown dwarf from another star AND say it's a planet then be my guest.

Electric universe theory is totally absurd.


I never said it was both at the same time.

I said if it was placed out side of the sun's electrical influence, its magnetosphere would glow like a brown dwarf star, because that's what a brown dwarf star is.

If Jupiter's magnetosphere lit up in a discharge, it would appear to be the size of the full moon.

You do believe in auroras right?


[edit on 8-7-2010 by mnemeth1]



posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 05:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by mnemeth1

Originally posted by Gentill Abdulla

Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by Gentill Abdulla
 


If you want to believe there are stars made of hypothetical matter that spin around on their axis 67,000 times per minute, be my guest.

The theory is totally absurd.



If you want to believe that saturn is a brown dwarf from another star AND say it's a planet then be my guest.

Electric universe theory is totally absurd.


I never said it was both at the same time.

I said if it was placed out side of the sun's electrical influence, its magnetosphere would glow like a brown dwarf star, because that's what a brown dwarf star is.

If Jupiter's magnetosphere lit up in a discharge, it would appear to be the size of the full moon.



So now its a planet by day brown dwarf by night?



posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 05:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Gentill Abdulla
 


nothing can't bend and impart force on something.

space is nothing, therefore it can't bend.



posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 05:07 PM
link   
reply to post by mnemeth1
 

Yeah they are due to the solar wind interacting with the magnetic field of earth.



posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 05:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by Gentill Abdulla
 


nothing can't bend and impart force on something.

space is nothing, therefore it can't bend.



You keep saying space is nothing without showing solid proof of that. Are you just basing your absolute "space is nothing" on nothing but your view of the universe? "Nothing" is an awfully strong term...



posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 05:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by Gentill Abdulla
 


nothing can't bend and impart force on something.

space is nothing, therefore it can't bend.



Well just see my reasoning on why a 4-d tesseract would not be detectable to our universe.

It's in my thread that I showed earlier.

[edit on 8-7-2010 by Gentill Abdulla]



posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 05:10 PM
link   
Could one of you experts in GR explain exactly how the force of gravity arises from bending space?

If space is nothing, then no matter how much that nothing bends, it can't impart force on something.

Space has to physically be something in order for it to impart force on a physical object.

As far as I'm aware, space itself has never been demonstrated to be anything more than a place in which matter resides.

This little stumbling block has been holding back the unification of GR and SR for the past 80 years hasn't it?






[edit on 8-7-2010 by mnemeth1]



posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 05:12 PM
link   
reply to post by mnemeth1
 


We mean the CONTINUUM SPACE-TIME.

Did you even bother to look at the thread I showed to you?



posted on Jul, 8 2010 @ 05:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gentill Abdulla

Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by Gentill Abdulla
 


nothing can't bend and impart force on something.

space is nothing, therefore it can't bend.



Well just see my reasoning on why a 4-d tesseract would not be detectable to our universe.

It's in my thread that I showed earlier.

[edit on 8-7-2010 by Gentill Abdulla]


So you want me to believe in non-detectable things?



new topics

top topics



 
9
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join