It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Orion7911
The FACT you actually think i'm referring to the explosions is far more comical
except once again, there's testimony from firefighters that contradict what you claim was never heard including secondary explosions,
not to mention you've ignored addressing the SOUND recording equipment issue/speed of light vs sound issue,
the footage that contains NO AUDIO (how convenient) the footage that passed through Fbi (perps) hands
and you also fail to offer any logical argument against military incidiaries, advanced demolition tech that can CONTROL the emission of SOUND,
and on top of all that, i see no logical explanation for how explosions (if they weren't masked and assuming they were traditional) occurring TOP to BOTTOM could be heard or distinguished by EVERYONE in the immediate area (such as the location of the firefighters you're talking about) during the "collapse" which would itself mask any explosions that might be occurring.
by that logic, i guess you'd have to be a closet no-planer SC fan too then since you're saying witnesses are trumped by video/audio which contain irrefutable evidence of fakery.
so the op is suggesting the CD charges would have knocked them to their feet etc?
Originally posted by Orion7911
your point is moot until you can first explain the dustification/pulverization anomaly that occurred at wtc 1&2 and explain the dustification of the spire for starters. Just because there's steel that wasn't "pulverized" hardly invalidates the possibility of an unknown energy source which evidence suggests was some type of DEW.
which shows me you've done little or no research nor have any knowledge about something called FIELD EFFECTS...i suggest you educate yourself a bit more and hopefully you'll realize how ignorant your remark is.
Originally posted by grom0007
The reason I bring this up is because the WTC collapse exhibited similar characteristics...
What I am guessing here...is TOO MANY Hollywood movies, which (before CGI was commonly used) relied on miniatures, to depict buildings blowing up, being destroyed, etc....those images )fake) have left an entire generation of people with incredibly false impressions, of how they "think" it "should" look, when a real building collapses.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
"Dustification" is a made up term coined by the conspiracy theorists (specifically, Judy Wood) so explaining how a process unfolded according to a made up word is absurd.
If all of the steel and everything elses at the WTC did not turn to dust, there would have been a rubble pile 25-30 stories high, instead of a rubble pile 4-5 stories high. A fire induced pancake collapse, as advocated by the delusional, would never have left such a small pile of rubble.
Originally posted by PookztA
Wow. It never ceases to amaze me how quickly "truth seekers" like GoodOlDave will make accusations and criticisms about others without providing any links or proofs to back up their claim. For example, implying that Dr. Judy Wood is a 'conspiracy theorist' instead of a scientist, or implying that her conclusions are 'absurd', without providing any proof or evidence to back up such outrageous and offensive claims, really shows what kind of "truth seeker" GoodOlDave really is.
Scientists often have to create terms to describe new phenomena as it is observed. Scientists observe things, describe them, analyze them, and try to explain why. They do not point fingers or cast blame unless the evidence clearly fingers the bad guy, and even then they are usually reluctant. I know, because I vigorously studied the Biological and Chemical sciences for 5 years, and now I am studying Medical Sciences and all related fields (biochemistry, immunology, physiology, embryology, anatomy, microbiology, neuroscience, genetics, etc. etc. etc.)
Not only is Dr. Wood the only 9/11 researcher to put forth a conclusion that actually explains ALL the evidence, but she is also the ONLY 9/11 researcher EVER to file evidence in a court of law. One of her cases made it to the U.S. Supreme Court in October 2009, and you can read about her court cases here:
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
If there was a World Trade Center complex in LA right now - an exact copy of the one in NYC prior-9/11:
[imagine all initial conditions - planes, weather, direction, speed etc - are the same as 9/11]
1) what would be the probability of one of the Twin Towers being totally floored from the impact of an airliner?
2) what would be the probability of both being floored by such impacts?
3) if the Twin Towers were both hit, what would be the probability of a third building being floored, despite not being hit by an airliner itself?
Now, either you Americans are really bad at construction (I don't think so) or some kind of freak mathematical anomaly happened that day. Or something more sinister...