It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
As it turns out it was done more or less sporadically. You see, when I decide to research something I don’t do a half- assed job of it. So I pulled a sample size of ten days from each paper. I began the splendidly tedious process of comparing the incidence of the same birth announcements being listed in both papers. Mainly with an eye towards how often they matched in exact order.The only time this occurred in that particular way within the ten days that I researched, was on the dates that had obama’s birth announcements.
Can you rewrite your post in English and not in hip hop please? I would like to understand it.
Originally posted by Doctor G
Violator1 saw my post was a dup & let me know.
I can just see 3 different groups with the same list changing 3 different locations but in their own way. It MUST have been Republicans under Bush.
Originally posted by ThaLoccster
I cannot understand what the guy is trying to say, his whole point escapes me.
Originally posted by RedGolem
The writer is saying he has found inconsistencies with the news papers printing the birth announcement of Obama.