Black hole to eat the earth within 50 months?

Well if this thing gets created by the guys at CERN then at least they die first..We get 50 months to have fun and laugh at them...

Thats much more time than someone telling me a NUke is on the way to my house

I highly doubt the world would end this way. How credible is this scientist in his research? We should already know if a black hole was near the Earth.

no one knows what exactly happens in a blackhole anyway

reply to post by cronotrigger30


Have you read Stephen Kings Langoliers?

Thats what I'd envision.....Scary stuff..

Originally posted by dragnet53

Originally posted by star in a jar
Hmm, maybe there's something to this- I've read somewhere that remote viewers couldn't 'See' anything after 2012, that there was just nothing to be seen after that time

Not even the web bot can see past 2012.

Actually they do see past 2012 but they report a gap for several months in 2012 and seem to think it is due to the internet going down.

Originally posted by RemainSkeptical
It is worth noting that all the particle collisions occurring at the LHC @ CERN, or at other manmade particle accelerators, are a fraction of the energy of the collisions between protons ejected by the sun colliding with the atoms and molecules in our atmosphere (which have been happening for billions of years). My point is, if black holes were a possible result from proton + proton collisions (such as those at the LHC) then we would be swimming in them by now. The sun and earth system is the ultimate LHC- and we are still here.

Well this is actually a bit of a misconception. A good analogy would be if you were to randomly shoot a shotgun at the sky... eventually you might hit a plane. With the LHC, you are focusing on a plane, with a lot more than a shotgun. It only takes a fraction of the energy of a bomb to set one off, so the argument that we aren't using the same levels of energy is moot.

What we aren't considering is the space between molecules. On a subatomic scale, there is vast distances between what we see as matter. It is with relative ease that particles can pass each other without colliding. Most of what the sun ejects does not interact with the matter of the earth. A large amount is deflected by the Van Allen belts thus keeping us all alive.

For the others that DIDN'T READ the op's post. It isn't 50 months from the formation of a black hole, but 50 months from now that one of many black holes created might not dissipate and thus consume the Earth. So NASA seeing a converging black hole is irrelevant. All of this is hypothesized, but good food for thought.

..Ex

I have serious doubts that an artificially created black-hole at CERN will consume the planet faster than the Black-hole in Washington DC.

Sorry to those hopeing for a quick death
Unless I've got my sci-fi confused with sci-theory

Although being sucked into the black hole would appear almost instantaneous to an outside observer...to the individual being consumed, it would seem to last an enternity...imagine going feet first, and watching your legs stretch, and seperate....nice....and it will last for an excrutiatingly long long time...at least from your perspective.

Someones gotta come up with an idea to save us. Hrmm, I guess it might as well be me.

Since eating matter makes a black hole get bigger, we could throw a bunch of anti-matter on it to make it throw up and get smaller.

reply to post by Romantic_Rebel

We should already know if a black hole was near the Earth.

Remember now that sky is alot bigger than it looks, right?

It just might not be so simple to say, sure we'd know!

Sounds like what happened to Vulcan on the latest Star trek Movie...

Well, we can't stop a bloody oil leak, so stopping a black hole would be a joke.

I would say that is impossible but I still haven't seen whats at the bottom of those sinkholes in Guatemala or Russia for that matter.