posted on Jun, 4 2010 @ 11:26 AM
How is this an unknown forest? The article itself states that scientists were looking for "potential conservation sites", and that the nearby
villages new of this place... it's just that this area was "scientifically unexplored"; meaning scientists haven't gone through it.
AND, the article also goes on to say that, well, most of the pictures included in the opening post are of known species... it's the snake that's
new, along with some plant life. All those posters going on about "oooo" and "ahhhh"? Yeah, those aren't new.
People... you've been misled, or misinformed... or just commenting on things without having followed through on them.