It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
Ah, but at least you would be paying "Cosa Nostra" protection money voluntarily.
When the State runs the security, they hold a gun to your head.
Under a private system, if you don't want protection, you don't have to buy it. This may be fine for safe areas or for people that like to carry a gun.
When the State offers security services, they come to your home and put a gun to your head, forcing you to pay for it.
Which is a more civilized system?
Originally posted by daskakik
Well "Cosa Nostra" makes offers you can't refuse so to me they seem about the same.
For example in the situation I mentioned I may have been able to work if I had struck a deal and offered to hand over a cut. No gun to the head but I would still be handing over money I had righfully earned to someone else because of their position above the law.
I get the illusion of choice so that makes it seem more civil but in the end it's still looting be it public or private.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
The difference is one is voluntary, the other is not.
Paying a private security firm for services is voluntary.
Paying the State for security services is not voluntary.
You are correct that public security is just like the Mafia, there is no difference.
Originally posted by daskakik
It isn't voluntary if you have to have it. The only thing is that you would get to choose the security company you wish to employ.
Public security is just like the mafia but the mafia started out as private security. What does that tell you?
Originally posted by MessOnTheFED!
reply to post by hawkiye
WOW! I dont even remember replying to you at all. Its deffinately nice to see that you are standing up for someone else. Only if you could do that in reality.
It appears to me that you and your friends best bet would be to poole up your money and buy a houseboat and go live in international waters.
MessOnTheFED!
[edit on 3-6-2010 by MessOnTheFED!]
It is estimated that the Sicilian Mafia costs the Sicilian economy more than €10 billion a year through protection rackets. Roughly 80% of Sicilian businesses pay protection money to Cosa Nostra. Monthly payments can range from €200 for a small shop or bar to €5,000 for a supermarket. Targets who refuse to buy protection are usually harassed, often through property damage; physical assault is rare. In Sicily, protection money is known as pizzo; the anti-extortion support group Addiopizzo derives its name from this.
Originally posted by daskakik
reply to post by mnemeth1
My point was that the Cosa Nostra began as private security. In the New World they became the mafia and started going into other criminal endevors.
My point is that if one group tries to muscle you into buying protection you either buy from them or from some other group to protect you from the first group. Either way they make sure you are paying.
If it's to the gov it's called tax and if it's to private security its a monthly expense. In either case it's your money being forced from your pocket. You can choose not to pay but then you have to face the consequences. In most cases people will pay.
Now ask yourself why a shop owner would willingly pay the mafia protection money.
They do it because they know that if someone robs them, the f'n mafia will hunt them down and kick their azz, unlike the police who will sit around and eat doughnuts. Now that's a security service haha.
Originally posted by daskakik
reply to post by mnemeth1
No one said it would be a monopoly on force but a sharing like the actual mafia with families controlling certain cities or even certain areas.
Outkast does make a good point that the protection is from the mafia itself although it also means that they will go after anyone that messes with you.
You'd rather pay a private thug instead of a corrupt government. To me they are one and the same so I have no problem with paying my taxes.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
I don't feel his point is valid because, as the researcher points out, the people WANT the protection service. They are actively seeking out the mafia and REQUESTING protection services.
If you read further, it says incidents of people getting beat up for not paying are rare.
They are rare because most people WANT the protection offered by the mafia.
And I also disagree that paying protection money is the same as paying taxes. Taxes are used for all manner of evil, not just protection services. War would be impossible without taxes. Genocide would be impossible without taxes. Government contracts, kickbacks, and central banks would be impossible without taxes.
All evil stems from taxes.
The mafia might beat you up for not paying protection money, but they aren't going to seize your home and auction it off at tax sale.
Originally posted by daskakik
all the evils that you attribute to taxes would still come about from this money.
[edit on 3-6-2010 by daskakik]
Its TAXES not THEFT.
Some common areas people can cut back. are stop buying lunch at work and pack your lunch. I know folks who spend $40-$60 a week on lunches. Crap foods like sodas cookies candy etc. Hobbies. Do you really need the latest CD or Movie or? etc etc etc.
Now every time you go to the store buy some extra canned goods they are cheap and build up fast and you'll hardly notice the extra cost. If you can by wheat rice and beans in bulk 50-100 pounds it is relatively cheap anywhere from 10-20 dollars. Check LDS canneries in your phone book. Water is the most under prepared for item.
Unless you're destitute there is really no excuse for not getting prepared. Check out this site: www.preparednesspro.com...
What is to stop this person from say... requiring that you either surrender your person firearms to him or a 3rd party while you labor for him on his property?
I mean you're starving right? And then what's to stop him from say... putting some sort of restraining device on your person while you are indebted to him for the food he's shared with you and yours? Again, it's this or starvation.
What's to stop him from never removing these restraining devices when he decides he likes your labor too much to let you go?
It seems those of you who are so anti-government and anti-tax really expect the best out of people in the worst situations.
I personally expect and plan for the worst.