It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by juveous
Originally posted by Geeky_Bubbe
Any drug - legal or not - that impairs your ability behind the wheel [or controls] of a mechanized vehicle - be it lawn mower, tractor, boat with a combustion engine, etc. - anywhere - be it on a roadway, on navigable water, in a field, on your private property, on your rooftop for that matter - is a crime. Well, at least in *my* state, and I believe in others as well though I cannot attest to that as fact.
Being a self-professed caffeine addict, I can state without a moment's doubt that I have been over caffeinated on several occasions, none of which *impaired* my physical or mental faculties. At worst I suffered the shakes, a racing heartbeat, and unsettled digestion. However, if someone were to be *impaired* by such a condition then it *would* be illegal for them to drive -- at least in my state.
Are you in California? Because my friend who just got arrested for a possible DUI told me the same thing.
It is preposterous. The entire law needs to be re-stated with specificity. This is why people get wrongfully accused, because laws are too vague.
It should be "any substance that impairs your ability to timely react"
Caffeine does the exact opposite. It magnifies your reaction time.
Originally posted by Geeky_Bubbe
Originally posted by juveous
Originally posted by Geeky_Bubbe
Any drug - legal or not - that impairs your ability behind the wheel [or controls] of a mechanized vehicle - be it lawn mower, tractor, boat with a combustion engine, etc. - anywhere - be it on a roadway, on navigable water, in a field, on your private property, on your rooftop for that matter - is a crime. Well, at least in *my* state, and I believe in others as well though I cannot attest to that as fact.
Being a self-professed caffeine addict, I can state without a moment's doubt that I have been over caffeinated on several occasions, none of which *impaired* my physical or mental faculties. At worst I suffered the shakes, a racing heartbeat, and unsettled digestion. However, if someone were to be *impaired* by such a condition then it *would* be illegal for them to drive -- at least in my state.
Are you in California? Because my friend who just got arrested for a possible DUI told me the same thing.
No, I'm on the "right" coast.
It is preposterous. The entire law needs to be re-stated with specificity. This is why people get wrongfully accused, because laws are too vague.
It should be "any substance that impairs your ability to timely react"
Caffeine does the exact opposite. It magnifies your reaction time.
I would like to clarify and or politely disagree...
No, the laws are not vague at all. There are actually fairly standard measures of what constitutes impaired driving and what does not.
We cannot use "reaction time" as a measure because that would be inherently discriminatory to physically challenged folk and the elderly. Now, we could debate the merits of such discrimination, but that's not within the scope of this topic, unless I'm mistaken.
Originally posted by juveous
How would the physically challenged or elderly be discriminated against, they didn't' "use" anything. Everyone's reaction time is different already anyways. - I was referring to using a "substance" that would decrease your reaction time. - and then using a device to detect some type of "consumption" of it.
If granny is getting pulled over because the patrol thinks they are impaired behind the wheel - DUI or not, she should get off the road.
IDK - when it comes down to it - any form of reckless driving warrants some type of "influence". But the influence that the law states is referring to a drug - that is why if there was a way to test the consumption of drugs that decreased reaction time, it would be more specific.
just my opinion.