[RINGS] We have a serious problem!, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 8-6-2004 @ 05:14 PM by PurdueNuc
You are bluffing, -5-. It's an old trick - something goes wrong, or something is not as we would expect, and you take credit for causing it. If you really had two of the rings, soon to get a third, why would you bother telling us? What two rings are you claiming you have? Are you going to tell us that Simon (or whomever) mailed you the first ring? I doubt it. You are obviously not on our side (our side being with 0,1,2,3,4 and Simon). So, that means that you are claiming you have two (soon to be all three) of the "real" rings, which means you are missing the first ring.

You ever play Monopoly? You know how it is when one person has three of the railroads, and someone else has the other one? Very rarely will the second person sell or trade the last railroad to the first person - there has to be some guarantee of immunity, or another very worthwhile prize. So, guess what? YOU WILL NEVER HAVE ALL FOUR RINGS! Unless you can give us a very good reason as to why you should have all four rings, and what you are willing to give us to obtain that ring. Maybe it is you who should give us the rings? Either way, if all is as you claim, we are in a stalemate.

You continue to post here because you need our help for something. Simon and company allow you to continue posting here because apparently we need your help for something. Why don't you just come out with it? Cryptic posts and insults will get you nowhere. Perhaps some sort of deal can be arranged. If not, than we shall see you in eternity.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^