It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
2002: World's biggest telescope to prove Americans really walked on Moon
www.telegraph.co.uk...
"Conspiracy theorists, you have a problem. In an effort to silence claims that the Apollo Moon landings were faked, European scientists are to use the world's newest and largest telescope to see whether remains of the spacecraft are still on the lunar surface."
2010: No conclusive photos
2005: Spacecraft to check out Apollo Moon sites
www.usatoday.com...
2010: No conclusive photos
2009: Proof! Probe photos of Apollo landing sites reveal to doubters that man DID walk on the Moon
www.dailymail.co.uk...
2010: No conclusive photos
So, in conclusion, the press says 'we're going to prove it.' People believe it. They never follow up. And here we are in 2010 none the wiser.
Although Google uses the word satellite, most of the high-resolution imagery is aerial photography taken from aircraft flying at 800-1500 feet rather than from satellites.
Originally posted by DJW001
nobody has ever promised you your pictures.
2002: World's biggest telescope to prove Americans really walked on Moon
www.telegraph.co.uk...
"Conspiracy theorists, you have a problem. In an effort to silence claims that the Apollo Moon landings were faked, European scientists are to use the world's newest and largest telescope to see whether remains of the spacecraft are still on the lunar surface."
2010: No conclusive photos
2005: Spacecraft to check out Apollo Moon sites
www.usatoday.com...
2010: No conclusive photos
2009: Proof! Probe photos of Apollo landing sites reveal to doubters that man DID walk on the Moon
www.dailymail.co.uk...
2010: No conclusive photos
So, in conclusion, the press says 'we're going to prove it.' People believe it. They never follow up. And here we are in 2010 none the wiser.
The VLT team hopes to improve on this, with the aim of detecting clear evidence for the presence of the landers. The base of the lunar modules measured about 10ft across, but would cast a much longer shadow under ideal conditions.
Dr West said that the challenge pushed the optical abilities of one VLT mirror to its limits: if this attempt failed, the team planned to use the power of all four mirrors. "They would most probably be sufficiently sharp to show something at the sites," he said.
I have worked with Richard for some times (he was my thesis supervisor almost 20yrs ago) - the least I can say is that he was a very very careful gentleman, and that he very seldom issue anything like a bold statement. I can of course not claim he did not actually say that, but I have a suspicion that the journalists might have ... extrapolated a little what he said. This particular journalist does not strike me as very accurate (cf the notes in the above texts about the factual errors).
Originally posted by Phage
Do you ever read anything other than headlines?
My emails to Dr. West of the VLT
Dear Richard,
I've been following the VLT for a number of years and was wondering if you have had any success in locating the Apollo remnants on the moon's surface.
I understand from an article written in 2002 in the UK Telegraph, that if one mirror failed you would consider using all 4 mirrors.
I was wondering, did you have any success using all 4 mirrors?
Here is the old article.
www.telegraph.co.uk...
I'm very interested in this project and would appreciate any update.
2nd email
Hi Richard, I'm sorry, I know you must be very busy, but if you find a
few spare seconds would you be able to answer my email sent
previously.
Thanks.
Originally posted by ^anubis^
What gets me going is how come we don't see any stars or other planets in the back ground. Is space really that lonely?
Originally posted by Phage
"Renowned" Eleanor Blakely? Sure, why not.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
you don't suppose that in that shot there's a huge boulder partially blocking our view of his leg?
"Gene stepped to the northeast corner of fragment 1, put his left hand on the dust-covered shelf to support himself, and reached out as far as possible toward the center of the dusted area and swept the bag twice from his right to his left, leaving furrows and, at the lefthand end of each furrow, a small mound of dust where he stopped... A labeled detail from frame AS17-140-21496 shows the sample location, the area on the shelf probably disturbed by his left hand, and the area on the ground between fragment 1 and the foreground rock that he disturbed while taking the sample and earlier, at about 165:25:48, in the flightline."
Originally posted by weedwhacker
you don't suppose that in that shot there's a huge boulder partially blocking our view of his leg?
Originally posted by DJW001
It looks like dust spilling off the sole of the astronaut's boot.
Originally posted by nataylor
It's a rock in front of his foot Cernan disturbed while sampling.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
I see his lower leg, to the ankle, and the boot...slightly flexed.