posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 06:36 PM
Many will beaware of BP's latest "maintanence problem", the Louisinana oil leak
www.huffingtonpost.com...
But here is about as much "news" info as I could find about why it's going to take weeks to cap the leak...
"The object of this game is to shut off the flow," he said.
Engineers are believed to be working on a dome-like device to cover oil rising to the surface and pump it to container vessels but it may be
weeks before this is in place.
Source:
news.bbc.co.uk...
CONCRETE IT: Did you know...
Some (commercial) concretes are known to set under water.
Here's how to do it: imgs.ebuild.com...
There's even a whole forum discussion about it:
www.answerbag.com...
So why can't a few (massive) shipments of concrete be dropped onto the oil leak, on the pipeline?
Maybe the whole pipeline would become intombed in concrete, but who gives a damn? Espically given the other costs (like BP's furute litigation being
one of them)?
Espically when "Directional Drilling":
en.wikipedia.org...
www.enermaxinc.com...
could easily be used to tap into the oil source at some future date. (and so extracted until depletion)!
But surely BP isn't "too big" to hire the right people, in the right places, for the right kind of creative thinking?
Or is there some other
explanation? Conspiracy, but to do what, for whom?
I know oil will interfer with concrte setting. But surely that would only remain a problem, if you didn't dump the right number of concrete
shipments?
I'm amazed the technological total mankind is to just let the leaks leak a few more thousand thousand barrels, days, for a few more weeks!