It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
I've read Jaques Ellul I know what propaganda is. Class dismissed.
Then why are you so bad at it? Were you implying that the crowd celebrating on the ABC coverage were making secret hand signals? So, in addition to the 400,000 people who actually worked on the space program, there were thousands of extras hired by TV networks to "fake" celebrating? Tell me, Sayonara, who wasn't in on it?
pay special attention at about 1:00 in this video down in the bottom left there are some dudes making some interesting hand signals.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
Got any of that proof yet that men landed on the moon??
That's not the point of this thread. It's about a young aussie "genius" that has been shown to be a liar. Got any proof that he's merely incompetent yet?
Does DJW001 purposefully replace "interesting" with "secret"? Yes.
Does DJW001 engage in propaganda or was this an editing mistake? It was propaganda.
Why was it propaganda? Because DJW001 next dredges up the old "400,000 people" counter-claim so beloved by the NASA cheerleading squad and he rather unskillfully tries to pin that claim on me when I didn't make it.
I'm quite sure that 000063 could tell us what kind of fallacy that is, won't you?
There you go again using that L-word because your argument is without merit.
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
Hey FoosM here is some originally broadcast ABC footage of an ABC News sponsored event for the Apollo 11 moon landing.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/0fba78d87f7d.jpg[/atsimg]
There you go again using that L-word because your argument is without merit.
Originally posted by FoosM
You may not, but thats how they are being defined.
So it could very well be that you are not seeing the originals, correct?
There you lost me. What does orbiting the moon have to do with photos of the Earth?
Now here is the kicker. All Apollo photography is suspect. Why? Because nobody got to see them till some time after the missions. Plenty of time for photo manipulation. Would you agree with that?
The only strong evidence that one could possibly use is LIVE tv footage that showed the Earth. And then matching that image of Earth to satellite imagery. Do we have any examples of that?
Lets get into that. Analyze what is going on here. And why I ask the question, what part of the documentary was a lie?
Originally posted by 000063
Affirming the consequent.
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by Illustronic
Nobody is going to be able to explain to you what things should look like on the moon because your understanding of such things, as this Ausie kid's understanding of things, is horribly lacking.
On the one hand you say nobody/ will be able to explain it:
(Because no man has been on the moon)
Scientists have confirmed it. Repeatedly. Expecting Joe Citizen to know what it "should" look like is a recipe for disaster. For example, Christopher Columbus knew the world was round. A lot of people did. Napoleon wasn't particularly short for his day. The Salem Witch Trials never burned anyone at the stake. A lot of popular conceptions about how things "should" be are just plain wrong.
On the other hand you say we lack understanding.
(as in we should know how these things should look like)
Here's a new tactic; explain what scientists have confirmed that it looks "wrong", or that the facts are incorrect. Scientists in the field of study in question, that is. No linking to Jarrah videos. I want you to find something yourself.
Well since you believe man has landed on the moon, and you know how this should look like,
explain why it looks so fake, or why the way it looks, looks right!edit on 2011/5/13 by 000063 because: +edit on 2011/5/13 by 000063 because: +edit on 2011/5/13 by 000063 because: Stupid confusing tags.
No, Sayanara, FoosM prevaricates; Jarrah White full on lies
Hi DJ. Can you help me? How do differenciate between a lie , as in knowingly trying to decieve, and a mistake, as in giving wrong information?
You reference instances where Jarrah made ERRORS... how do you know they were 'lies'??
Once again I question your vitriol. It seems way out of line with what young Jarrah is trying to achieve through time and effort. The poor man gets so much stick... why would he continue doing this if he didn't BELIEVE???
Surely you remember this. Jarrah is little more than a mean spirited bully who refuses to respect anyone. Why should he expect respect in return? I am giving him the benefit of the doubt in claiming that he is insincere and merely making these ridiculous videos as a means to draw attention to himself. If he is sincere, he must be delusional, as he himself has seen all the evidence that contradicts his claims.
Mr. Windley, I call you Mister because I doubt you are even qualified to be a garbage truck driver...I recorded it (Just so I could laugh at your and Jim Oberg's ignorance "... Sometimes I think NASA picks its employees off the street...if I were a teacher and you were one of my students I'd instantly stamp your report with an F and tell you to go home and be more thorough.... Am I going too fast for your pea brain? Let me go slower. ...Until you can conduct a proper experiment Windley, your results are[vile language deleted]. What next? Are you going to go round insisting that the moon is made of cheese? My IQ is above 150 and I eat Swiss cheese minded propagandists like you Mr Windley for breakfast. You know what I find most ironic about that disgraceful documentary? "If we look very closely, we can see the LEM did in fact disturb a fair bit of dust, just not enough to cover the landing pads" BWAAAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHA!!!! And there the propagandists go, contradicting the very words from the astronaut's mouth "We're picking up somedust!"..."We're picking up some dust!" [repeated 15 times!--DJW001]...Sigh. I wish the pro-NASA morons could go off to their fantasy world and leave us intelligent people in peace. In the words of my late grandfather, you might as well believe in Snow White and The Seven Dwarfs. In the end its just scientific vandalism, pathetic really.
Jarrah White
Would you agree that Jarrah is sincere in his beliefs?
Oh, and here is young Jarrah's latest video updating his status... NOT the moon rock videos but he does explain what is happening to them (this month him say)... very interesting information about youtube's strange censorship policy. Whoever wrote that legal speak from moonmovie.com deserves a pat on the back.
YouTube reserves the right to decide whether Content violates these Terms of Service for reasons other than copyright infringement, such as, but not limited to, pornography, obscenity, or excessive length. YouTube may at any time, without prior notice and in its sole discretion, remove such Content and/or terminate a user's account for submitting such material in violation of these Terms of Service.
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
Hey FoosM here is some originally broadcast ABC footage of an ABC News sponsored event for the Apollo 11 moon landing.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/0fba78d87f7d.jpg[/atsimg]
Let me get this straight SJ.
What you are saying is that only ABC showed the live footage of the Apollo 11 landing?
How could a public station, get exclusive deal for a public event such as the landing?
So what exclusives did NBC and CBS get?
No. No-one who is intelligent enough to operate that editing software can be so stupid as to not know how shadows form, or honestly believe that any government, however evil, would spend $25,400,000.000 (in 1975 dollars) on a hoax. (World War II only cost $300,000,000 in 1945 dollars)
The Zeiss 50mm and 36.5mm, f/0.7 lenses used to film candlelight sequences for "Barry Lyndon" without the addition of artificial light were originally still-camera lenses developed for use by NASA in the Apollo Moon-landing program, and modified by Cinema Products Corp. The 50mm lens, shown here in focusing mount, had to have the adjustable shutter blade, necessary for still photography, removed for filming... There were were only 10 of these Zeiss lenses ever produced. Three are owned by Kubrick, six by NASA and one can be found at the German Movie Museum in Frankfurt.
This video documents the initial field interpretation that the orange soil collected at Station 4 (Shorty Crater) was an oxide. It turned out to be composed of pyroclastic glass particles ejected by the impact which created Shorty. This was the only pyroclastic material sampled from a known stratigraphic context on the lunar surface.
We bought an old Newman Sinclair clockwork mechanism camera (no pun intended) for 40 Pounds. It's a beautiful camera and it's built like a battleship. We made a number of polystyrene boxes which gave about 18 inches of protection around the camera, and cut out a slice for the lens. We then threw the camera off a roof. In order to get it to land lens first, we had to do this six times and the camera survived all six drops. On the final one it landed right on the lens and smashed it but it didn't do a bit of harm to the camera. This, despite the fact that the polystyrene was literally blasted away from it each time by the impact. The next day we shot a steady test on the camera and found there wasn't a thing wrong with it. On this basis, I would say that the Newman Sinclair must be the most indestructible camera ever made.
During the Apollo moon landing broadcasted by the three major North American networks ABC, NBC and CBS.. it was late at night of July 21st, 1969.... each network presented slightly differing versions of history that evening... this is a fact.
And they couldnt take picture of stars
Because it appears that inertia is in effect!
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
And they couldnt take picture of stars
files.abovetopsecret.com...[/atsimg]
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
Because it appears that inertia is in effect!
Correct; inertia is in effect. Inertia and momentum work exactly the Same on the Moon as on Earth or in space. That's why the sample bags bobble and swing the way they do.
I've already claimed that DJ is being a bit uncharitable. Incompetence is only slightly less credible than actively lying, after all.
Originally posted by manmental
reply to post by DJW001
No, Sayanara, FoosM prevaricates; Jarrah White full on lies
Hi DJ. Can you help me? How do differenciate between a lie , as in knowingly trying to decieve, and a mistake, as in giving wrong information?
You reference instances where Jarrah made ERRORS... how do you know they were 'lies'??
Once again I question your vitriol. It seems way out of line with what young Jarrah is trying to achieve through time and effort. The poor man gets so much stick... why would he continue doing this if he didn't BELIEVE???
Would you agree that Jarrah is sincere in his beliefs?
Oh, and here is young Jarrah's latest video updating his status... NOT the moon rock videos but he does explain what is happening to them (this month him say)... very interesting information about youtube's strange censorship policy. Whoever wrote that legal speak from moonmovie.com deserves a pat on the back.
iA2vl0p-pIk
edit on 15-5-2011 by manmental because: (no reason given)