It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
One of the major problems encountered in time travel is not that of accidentally becoming your own father or mother. There is no problem involved in becoming your own father or mother that a broad-minded and well-adjusted family can’t cope with. There is no problem about changing the course of history - the course of history does not change because it all fits together like a jigsaw. All the important changes have happened before the things they were supposed to change and it all sorts itself out in the end.
The major problem is quite simply one of grammar, and the main work to consult in this matter is Dr. Dan Streetmentioner’s “Time Traveler’s Handbook of 1001 Tense Formations”. It will tell you, for instance, how to describe something that was about to happen to you in the past before you avoided it by time-jumping forward two days in order to avoid it. The event will be described differently according to whether you are talking about it from the standpoint of your own natural time, from a time in the further future, or a time in the further past and is further complicated by the possibility of conducting conversations while you are actually traveling from one time to another with the intension of becoming your own mother or father.
Most readers get as far as the Future Semiconditionally Modified Subinverted Plagal Past Subjunctive Intentional before giving up; and in fact in later editions of the book all the pages beyond this point have been left blank to save on printing costs.
The Hitchhicker’s Guide to the Galaxy skips lightly over this tangle of academic abstration, pausing only to note that the term “Future Perfect” has been abandoned since it was discovered not to be.
-Douglas Adams, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe
Originally posted by game over man
reply to post by silent thunder
You can not become your own mother or father. Your mother is Irish, your dad is German. You are 1/2 Irish 1/2 German. You go back in time and have a child with your mother. The child would be 3/4 Irish and 1/4 German, and it wouldn't be you, it would be an inbred child. Not sure what your post means how simple grammar debunks time travel.
Originally posted by silent thunder
Originally posted by game over man
reply to post by silent thunder
You can not become your own mother or father. Your mother is Irish, your dad is German. You are 1/2 Irish 1/2 German. You go back in time and have a child with your mother. The child would be 3/4 Irish and 1/4 German, and it wouldn't be you, it would be an inbred child. Not sure what your post means how simple grammar debunks time travel.
It is supposed to be humorous. Millions laughed at Adams' books. I guess you didn't.
But it does contain a deeper truth, below the layer of humor, which has to do with the way changes would automatically fit "like a jigsaw puzzle" to avoid paradox. Ultimately, it supports time travel, rather than debunking it, and it claims (in a humorous way) that there is no paradox at all to time travel, which is what the OP claims as well.