reply to post by jpmail
So by your logic one stupid person in any orginisation = a stupid one.
Wow what insight I must be stupid myself not to see it.
Time and time again the BNP candidates show themselves to be stupid. Sorry if you aren't aware of this, but this guy is about as intelligent as they
get. He is the media spokesman.... wouldn't it make sense to have someone who can portray their party a little bit better in that role!?
Lets cut to the chase your attempting to bash a political party because YOU do not agree with them. Now I will admit I don't like there message
as a whole although I think there are some points they are right on.
I'm sure I could find one thing I agreed with Hitler about, but that doesn't mean I would vote for a fascist party to solve immigration problems,
presuming that to offer voluntary repatriation out of the taxpayers pockets, and to prevent all coloured people from entering the country is
considered a viable option. It's not difficult to bash a party that offers nothing at all, yet expects votes. The full extent of his answers are
"I don't know".
Please climb down from the moral we all hate facists high horse and maybe just maybe you could bring something to the election debate worth
talking about.
The BNP aren't really considered a real political party for aware voters, they're a group of halfwit thugs who expose themselves to ridicule over
and over again.
The whole BNP = bad every other party = good is getting a bit tired. They are all as bad as one another
I haven't praised any other political party on this thread. Listen to the whole debate on the 5 live website link that I gave, and tell me what you
think the BNP have to offer. The guy had a chance, obviously didn't do any preparation worth bothering with, and made himself look a complete joke
of a pratt. He's even standing as a candidate in the election, and god knows who would vote for him after listening to his entire 20 mins of
questioning.
Perhaps the shortened version doesn't give the correct impression, and makes the candidate look like a victim of rough questionning, but in actual
fact the longer version provides a much better context to make a more accurate judgement. The radio host was entirely fair, and asked reasonable
questions.
Questions to consider: When has the BNP ever shown any intellectualness in a debate, or stood for anything reasonable? They only ever cause an
embarrassment for those poor voters who actually thought they were once worth voting for.
I remember the programme on TV the BNP wives filmed, and anytime somebody disagreed with them on the streets, they either replied with name calling,
or refused to debate. This was their choice to film it, and broadcast to the world, yet they did! It was bad judgement to choose to portray
themselves in that way, yet they simply don't care, or don't understand that their behaviour is abnormal, or too stupid to understand their
behaviour is extremely pathetic and discriminatary and ignorant towards everyone (not only brown/black people).
[edit on 25-4-2010 by john124]