It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Iran has no powerful allies
take the threat of force off the table, tell Tehran that we are willing to talk seriously about the issues that bother them (as well as the items that bother us), and try to cut a deal whereby Iran ratifies and implements the NPT Additional Protocol and is then permitted to enrich uranium for legitimate purposes (but not to weapons-grade levels).
The Iranian television report said naval, air and ground units from the Guard were participating in the three-day games codenamed "The Great Prophet." It said the war games will witness the commissioning of what it described as an "ultra-speed" vessel called "Ya Mahdi" and a total of 313 speedboats with the capability of firing rockets and missiles also would participate.
Originally posted by CanadianDream420
take the threat of force off the table, tell Tehran that we are willing to talk seriously about the issues that bother them (as well as the items that bother us), and try to cut a deal
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
At the end of World War II, rather than ship back thousands upon thousands of military airplanes, tanks, and jeeps, we simply destroyed them in place.
We did the same at the end of Vietnam, destroying or leaving most of our equipment there.
A good portion of the equipment in the First Gulf War ended up in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait afterwards.
In part we do this to save on the petrol, and wear and tear on transport ships and aircraft.
Originally posted by VendettaBeretta
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
At the end of World War II, rather than ship back thousands upon thousands of military airplanes, tanks, and jeeps, we simply destroyed them in place.
We did the same at the end of Vietnam, destroying or leaving most of our equipment there.
A good portion of the equipment in the First Gulf War ended up in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait afterwards.
In part we do this to save on the petrol, and wear and tear on transport ships and aircraft.
Wrong. We have treaties in place since after WWII that we must ship out all machinery. None can be left behind after a war.
I know cause my dad was working on the ships, bringing back. It's a pain in the ass but its our contractual obligation under international law.
Introduction
At the end of World War II, the U.S. government had tons of military equipment that it no longer needed. America shipped hundreds of excess armored vehicles, aircraft, naval vessels and infantry weapons to Europe and Asia, initiating its peacetime military aid program. Some of this surplus like C-47 transport planes and M-2 "half-tracks" transferred 40 years ago, to contain Soviet influence, is still used by many militaries in Latin America, Asia and Africa.
The end of the Cold War has again left the United States with much more equipment than it needs or can afford. While some excess weapons are destroyed or transferred to civilian agencies, most are given to foreign militaries through a variety of programs. Since 1990, the United States has transferred $7 billion of military equipment, including 3,900 heavy tanks and 500 ground attack jets, primarily to developing countries. Large quantities of surplus small arms and light weapons have also been exported.
Giving away excess weapons is often cheaper than destroying or storing them, and such transfers are seen as an easy way to curry diplomatic favor. Moreover, excess equipment is transferred in furtherance of U.S. policy goals, such as narcotics control, military cooperation or encouraging participation in multilateral peacekeeping operations.
However, surplus arms giveaways also raise several concerns, including issues of human rights, arms control, and fiscal responsibility. These concerns are compounded by the fact that many other countries also have large surplus arms holdings today. (The Federal Republic of Germany, for example, inherited the entire military of the German Democratic Republic.) In so much as U.S. policies may be used to justify similar actions by others, the impact of the cascade of surplus American arms deserves careful consideration.
This study examines exports of major military equipment and small arms declared excess by the U.S. Department of Defense from 1990 through 1995. It details the types and quantities of these weapons shipped from U.S. stocks, the recipients, the legal basis and decision-making process for surplus weapons exports, and the policy issues raised by these transfers. The bulk of this report comprises an appendix cataloguing all identifiable surplus arms transfers during 1990-1995, grouped primarily according to the type of military equipment transferred.
Originally posted by OZtracized
I wholeheartedly agree with you.
I know the U.S. has hinted a military action against Iran but surely the American people wouldn't swallow that turd sandwich for a third time? What did "Dubya" say? Fool me once........well.....you can't fool me again. Will they attack regardless of public opinion or will a terrorist group believed to be based in Iran carry out an attack on the U.S. with remarkably convenient timing?
Surely the American people won't swallow THAT turd sandwich.......again.
One of the more remarkable features about the endless drumbeat of alarm about Iran is that it pays virtually no attention to Iran's actual capabilities,
Further evidence of Iran's support of the Shia death squads and Sunni al Qaeda has emerged. At the end of December, two Iranian agents of the Qods force were arrested in a SCIRI compound in Baghdad. The Iraqi government was angry over the arrests, as the Iranians were part of a diplomatic delegation, and the agents were later released and deported.
But the Washington Post reported the two Iranian intelligence agents captured in Baghdad possessed "weapons lists, documents pertaining to shipments of weapons into Iraq, organizational charts, telephone records and maps, among other sensitive intelligence information... [and] information about importing modern, specially shaped explosive charges into Iraq." One was "the third-highest-ranking official of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards' al-Qods Brigade."
The New York Sun described the documents as "the equivalent of Iran's Iraq Study Group" which "show how the Qods Force — the arm of Iran's revolutionary guard that supports Shiite Hezbollah, Sunni Hamas, and Shiite death squads — is working with individuals affiliated with Al Qaeda in Iraq and Ansar al-Sunna." "We found plans for attacks, phone numbers affiliated with Sunni bad guys, a lot of things that filled in the blanks on what these guys are up to," an intelligence official told the New York Sun.
TEHRAN, Iran - The leaders of Iran and Syria said Tuesday that Hezbollah defeated Israel, with the Iranian president telling a cheering crowd that “God’s promises have come true” and the Syrian chief saying U.S. plans for reshaping the Middle East have been ruined.