It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Descriptions of indigo children include the belief that they are empathetic, curious, strong-willed, independent, and often perceived by friends or family as being weird; possess a clear sense of self-definition and purpose; and also exhibit a strong inclination towards spiritual matters from early childhood.
Indigo children have also been described as having a strong feeling of entitlement, or "deserving to be here." Other alleged traits include a high intelligence quotient, an inherent intuitive ability, and resistance to authority.[2][4]
Originally posted by indigothefish
ok, well here is an example why the thread title ( does not reflect itself
this thread, as stated, is about how indigos are no more special in any way than other people
it is an agreed fact though that some people do show to have blue or indigo auras through korilian photography
so here is an example, say i made a thread about how black people are no more special than asian people, and then i titled the thread "there is no such thing as black people"
see what i mean?
[edit on 4/20/2010 by indigothefish]
[edit on 4/20/2010 by indigothefish]
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
So generally they are classified as having a high IQ, having a sense of purpose, rejecting Authority and being extremely perceptive.
What did we use to call these people before the 1970's? Humans. Humans of above average intelligence.
Originally posted by indigothefish
reply to post by Chamberf=6
but in the end indigo children are people who have documented indigo auras by korrilian photography, that's all
so to imply that people with blue auras don't exist is incorrect
everything else though is true, they are no more special
Originally posted by indigothefish
so actually what i mean is
there IS such a thing as an indigo child (a person with a blue or indigo colored aura) but the definition does not go farther than that
any information beyond that are just opinions that people have come up with based on how and why different auras are different colors on different people, most assume that auras are connected to people personalities or something,
i personally don't follow that train of thought
but basically yeah, indigo children have blue auras, that's all
everything else is just opinion
This Indigo label described the energy pattern of human behavior that now exists in over 95% of children born in the last 20 years.
Originally posted by Son of Will
reply to post by BeastMaster2012
So you're basically saying that you've retained some childlike innocence into your matured personality. That's awesome, and more people should be so blessed. I also am an extremely empathetic person.
But this "Indigo Child" stuff is very specific. It's extraterrestrial souls/spirits that are coming into our present time to help heal the world.
This thought offends me on several levels. Firstly, humans are already capable of these benevolent mentalities. All the qualities (besides being ET) describe things that humans have been doing since the beginning of time. Logically speaking, if we can already do all these things, then what's the point of being an Indigo?
Secondly, I don't think humans need any help whatsoever from outside sources. Whatever the problem is, we always have the power to change it. It's just a matter of personal choice, multiplied by 7 billion people. The thought that some outside agency would carry us into enlightenment like a mother carrying a child is offensive. We don't need their help, and they shouldn't be messing with our personal affairs - if they are benevolent, they probably wouldn't be getting directly involved.
Thirdly, it creates a mentality of superiority in the individual. This is never healthy. Even if they don't say it, they think it. This is extremely common among all types of belief systems but it's just as ugly with 'Indigos'.
Fourthly - and I understand this isn't your experience, but it is nonetheless the experience of many others - I just don't like the fact that parents are pushing this belief onto their kids since infancy. This is also an extremely common practice among different belief systems, but likewise, it is just as ugly in this case.
Ultimately I think people rail against "indigos" because they consider it as arrogance masquerading as uniqueness.
Shouldn't people have the right to believe whatever they'd like?
Originally posted by indigothefish
um, indigo is a color, it's deep blue
and indigo child is a person with a blue aura
you can have your aura photo taken and seen with korrilian photography
the existence of auras and their color are debatable
but an indigo child is a person with an indigo aura
not a person who 'does not fit in'
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by prevenge
Since you like to point out others mistakes in spelling, the name of the person you are refuting is indigothefish. Not indigo-in-the-flesh LOL
As you like to say: "Make a mental note of it."
[edit on 20/4/2010 by Chamberf=6]
Originally posted by indigothefish
i did not know that is how krillian (sp?) was spelled or pronounced
i admit defeat within this range of knowledge, please continue without me