Another seriously undeniable flaw in the 'official' 9/11 story.

Originally posted by Alfie1

Originally posted by jprophet420

What are "such" investigations? Hijackings? No, the NTSB are not experts at hijackings. That's the FBI. The NTSB is the National Transportation SAFETY board. They don't investigate criminal activity.

The FBI determined the hijackers were Saudi's.

So we invaded Afghanistan.

Makes perfect sense.

In a nutshell you have just set out a main reason why the conspiracy theories are rubbish.

It is alleged that conspirators planned and executed the most complex and ruthless plan, involving demolition rigging of huge buildings, attacking the Pentagon by whatever means is your favourite, remote controlling planes, voice morphing, faking flight data recorders, faking crash sites, faking air traffic control communications, you name it. But, when it comes to a link with Iraq they totally fail to include anything ! Did they forget ?

LOL! I know it says not to use that kind of language but its true.

The government made the link. they broadcast it on TV over and over. The #2 reason cited for invading Iraq after "WMD" was that they were "training terrorists."

The reason we invaded Afghanistan: They were using drug money to train terrorists. We invaded them and cluster bombed them and yet the heroin flows on the streets of the US and the UK like rivers after the spring thaw.

Good job America, you left no stone unturned.

Originally posted by hooper
There is a plethora of data that identified the planes and their respective Flights. Radar tracking, voice recordings, ATC identification, etc. and the simple fact that of all the planes that took off on the morning of 9/11/2001 only four never landed.

I agree. I don't understand the intention of this conspiracy that instead of 4 planes being involved there are now 8? Where did the other 4 go? Why would the government not just rig-up the original 4 if the government did it? Why go get 4 other planes? I suppose the original 4 went through a spiral in to an alternate dimension? The survivors are now starring in the sequel to LOST?

Originally posted by jprophet420

Originally posted by Alfie1

Originally posted by jprophet420

What are "such" investigations? Hijackings? No, the NTSB are not experts at hijackings. That's the FBI. The NTSB is the National Transportation SAFETY board. They don't investigate criminal activity.

The FBI determined the hijackers were Saudi's.

So we invaded Afghanistan.

Makes perfect sense.

In a nutshell you have just set out a main reason why the conspiracy theories are rubbish.

It is alleged that conspirators planned and executed the most complex and ruthless plan, involving demolition rigging of huge buildings, attacking the Pentagon by whatever means is your favourite, remote controlling planes, voice morphing, faking flight data recorders, faking crash sites, faking air traffic control communications, you name it. But, when it comes to a link with Iraq they totally fail to include anything ! Did they forget ?

LOL! I know it says not to use that kind of language but its true.

The government made the link. they broadcast it on TV over and over. The #2 reason cited for invading Iraq after "WMD" was that they were "training terrorists."

The reason we invaded Afghanistan: They were using drug money to train terrorists. We invaded them and cluster bombed them and yet the heroin flows on the streets of the US and the UK like rivers after the spring thaw.

Good job America, you left no stone unturned.

You can LOL all you want but the supposed strategic aims of a 9/11 inside job make no sense whatsoever.

It is alleged that this vast, bloody, and unbelievably complex conspiracy was devised as an excuse to invade Iraq. Trouble is that the incredibly ingenious conspirators, who could fake details down to flight training invoices for alleged terrorists, were apparently incapable of providing any link to Iraq.

It is true that Cheney huffed and puffed, briefly, about a possible link but none was ever established. The actual reasons given for invasion of Iraq were failure to abide by UN resolutions, in particular 1441, and likely continuing development of wmd.

The external links evident from 9/11 were to OBL and terrorist training camps in Afghanistan. So, far from helping to provide a reason to invade Iraq, 9/11 forced a diversion to Afghanistan which was just a pain in the butt.

The effect on drugs supplies is irrelevant . Poppy production is being attacked in Afghanistan and much heroin and coc aine in the US today comes from Mexico and Columbia. Do you think the US is planning to invade Mexico and Columbia ?

In stead of LOL-ing so much, I would suggest that you seriously look at the supposed strategic aims of a 9/11 inside job conspiracy because nothing makes any sense.