It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
God is only concerned with a person's SPIRITUAL condition, and what God said was entirely true, when they ate the fruit, immediately they died spiritually, their open communion with God was ruined by rebellion.
Originally posted by Hydroman
If you read the scripture, god told Adam and Eve that they would die the same day that they ate the fruit. They did not die until over 900 years later. That's what I'm saying.
The serpent said they would not die when they ate the fruit, and he was right.
You're wrong, the Word clearly says that Hell was created for Lucifer and the fallen angels. man goes there as well when they refuse the free gift of redemption offered to them.
Originally posted by Dark Ghost
Originally posted by JesusisTruth
It says they will be punished in hell.
that was my point.
peace.
The existence of a literal Hell would be one of the strongest indications that God does NOT exist. A just and loving God would not permit the existence of a place where even ONE of His creations were doomed to suffer for eternity without the chance for redemption.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
God is only concerned with a person's SPIRITUAL condition, and what God said was entirely true, when they ate the fruit, immediately they died spiritually, their open communion with God was ruined by rebellion.
Originally posted by Hydroman
If you read the scripture, god told Adam and Eve that they would die the same day that they ate the fruit. They did not die until over 900 years later. That's what I'm saying.
The serpent said they would not die when they ate the fruit, and he was right.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
You're wrong, the Word clearly says that Hell was created for Lucifer and the fallen angels. man goes there as well when they refuse the free gift of redemption offered to them.
God never created Hell for humans.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
God is only concerned with a person's SPIRITUAL condition, and what God said was entirely true, when they ate the fruit, immediately they died spiritually, their open communion with God was ruined by rebellion.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
God never created Hell for humans.
Originally posted by miriam0566
not to mention that even when they died 900 years later, it was because of the fruit. if they didnt eat the fruit, they would still be alive today
so even though they didnt die physically immediately, they did die as a result of their actions
Knowing that men would choose to end up there is not relevant. Souls are made for eternity, where else is God supposed to send souls who want nothing to do with Him? God's Word explicitly states that Hell was created for the Devil and his angels.
Originally posted by Hydroman
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
God never created Hell for humans.
Do you believe this god is omniscient? If so, the exact second he created hell, he knew that he would be burning man also. Matter of fact, he knew this before he created it. So, yes he did create it for man also. Or, what do you think he did? "Hmmm let's see....I'm gonna create this burning place for the devil." Years later, mankind falls and then...."Hmmm, I think I will also throw man in that fire too."
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
In fact, why even worry about it?? It's EXTREMELY easy to avoid Hell altogether, trust in Jesus to save you.
I didn't say you couldn't share your opinion with us all in another thread you create to discuss your opinion specifically. I posted the TOS of this forum which plainly states that unless the thread specifically deals with the existence of God then for all intents and purposes we are assuming He does exist.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by NOTurTypical
A very specific question was asked in the OP, and I gave a very specific answer to THAT question. If you feel the need to play mini-mod, I suggest that you hit the alert button, not go into a hand-slapping campaign. It is not your place to interpret the rules.
Don't patronize me, we all can plainly read what you posted. You said the "creation myth" is a lie.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by NOTurTypical
My post in no way says that there is or is not a God, just that the author made the story up, therefore, the answer to the question "Who lied" is the author of the book, thus it is a valid response to the question posed in the OP.