It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Beginning 1 year after enactment of the Cap and Trade Act, you won't be able to sell your home unless you retrofit it to comply with the energy and water efficiency standards of this Act. H.R. 2454, the "Cap & Trade" bill passed by the House of Representatives, if also passed by the Senate, will be the largest tax increase any of us has ever experienced.
The Congressional Budget Office (supposedly non-partisan) estimates that in just a few years the average cost to every family of four will be $6,800 per year.
No one is excluded.
However, once the lower classes feel the pinch in their wallets, you can be sure these voters get a tax refund (even if they pay no taxes at all) to offset this new cost. Thus, you Mr. and Mrs. Middle Class America will have to pay even more since additional tax dollars will be needed to bail out everyone else.
But wait. This awful bill (that no one in Congress has actually read) has many more surprises in it. Probably the worst one is this:
A year from now you won't be able to sell your house. Yes, you read that right.
The caveat is (there always is a caveat) that if you have enough money to make required major upgrades to your home, then you can sell it. But, if not, then forget it. Even pre-fabricated homes ("mobile homes") are included.
In effect, this bill prevents you from selling your home without the permission of the EPA administrator.
To get this permission, you will have to have the energy efficiency of your home measured.
Then the government will tell you what your new energy efficiency requirement is and you will be forced to make modifications to your home under the retrofit provisions of this Act to comply with the new energy and water efficiency requirements.
Then you will have to get your home measured again and get a license (called a "label" in the Act) that must be posted on your property to show what your efficiency rating is; sort of like the Energy Star efficiency rating label on your refrigerator or air conditioner.
If you don't get a high enough rating, you can't sell. And, the EPA administrator is authorized to raise the standards every year, even above the automatic energy efficiency increases built into the Act.
The EPA administrator, appointed by the President, will run the Cap & Trade program (AKA the "American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009") and is authorized to make any future changes to the regulations and standards he alone determines to be in the government's best interest. Requirements are set low initial y so the bill will pass Congress; then the Administrator can set much tougher new standards every year.
The Act itself contains annual required increases in energy efficiency for private and commercial residences and buildings.
However, the EPA administrator can set higher standards at any time.
Sect. 202:
Building Retrofit Program mandates a national retrofit program to increase the energy efficiency of all existing homes across America .
Beginning 1 year after enactment of the Act, you won't be able to sell your home unless you retrofit it to comply with the energy and water efficiency standards of this Act.
The report also finds that once a company is EnergyStar certified, it can download the logo and slap it on just about anything, even if they never submitted the product itself for certification. As for products that do get submitted, generally speaking the government just takes the manufacturer’s word for its energy consumption stats. For instance, according to a report on the Today Show, a refrigerator that carried the EnergyStar label used “twice as much energy as claimed.” They don’t do much, if any, independent testing.
So the whole thing is a sham. Are some products that carry the EnergyStar designation really more energy efficient? Sure. Just like some products that don’t carry the EnergyStar designation might really be more energy efficient than ones that do. Good luck figuring out which ones. It’s a crapshoot, which obviously defeats the purpose of having the designation at all. Naturally, instead of simply shutting down the operation (like they would if it were a private company), they’re going to “reform” it and “strengthen the program.”
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
baphomet420 is right. Any time I've sold a house, I had to have it inspected and make repairs before it sold.
Now that the health care passed, they are moving on to attack the next Obama bill with fear, exaggerations, more fear and BS. Death Panels! Forced Abortion!
Here we go again! Another Obama promise in the works (Energy efficient homes, clean energy jobs, reduce pollution, etc.) and the right goes wild!
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
baphomet420 is right. Any time I've sold a house, I had to have it inspected and make repairs before it sold.
Now that the health care passed, they are moving on to attack the next Obama bill with fear, exaggerations, more fear and BS. Death Panels! Forced Abortion!
Here we go again! Another Obama promise in the works (Energy efficient homes, clean energy jobs, reduce pollution, etc.) and the right goes wild!
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
baphomet420 is right. Any time I've sold a house, I had to have it inspected and make repairs before it sold.
Now that the health care passed, they are moving on to attack the next Obama bill with fear, exaggerations, more fear and BS. Death Panels! Forced Abortion!
Here we go again! Another Obama promise in the works (Energy efficient homes, clean energy jobs, reduce pollution, etc.) and the right goes wild!
As for the emails claim that the bill would make it illegal to sell your home without an energy audit and an upgrade in energy efficiency, that is also a lie.
...
FactCheck.org says that the bill only sets requirements for buildings built after the bill becomes law. If you currently own a home, nothing would change for you. The National Association of Home Builders told the website, "if you are talking specifically about energy-efficiency checks, or an energy audit, it is not required for existing home."
Q: Does the House energy bill subject owners of existing homes to an energy efficiency audit before they can sell?
A: Rep. Boehner and Rush Limbaugh got this wrong. The Realtors and home builders associations say there’s no such requirement in the bill, as do we.
Originally posted by baphomet420
wow...
you all do realize that in most cities, this already happens right???
its just now going to be federal for everywhere...
when you sell your house, an inspector pays a visit...
you will usually get something back like replacing windows, doors to meet modern codes...
you must replace that carpet because it smells like cat piss, etc...
this changes absolutely nothing for MOST of the population...
consider it consumer protection...
a free market in a society that is riddled with greed DOES NOT WORK...
people and companies have to be FORCED to do whats right..
sad but true...
am I the only one who believes this besides the current administration, or is everyone who thinks like me being silent???
Originally posted by Erasurehead
People must be FORCED to do whats right??
Right according to who?
This is the problem with progressives, they are convinced they are right and everyone else that disagrees must be forced into compliance.
Does individual liberty mean anything to you or should be all be forced to do what YOU think is right?
Originally posted by baphomet420
Originally posted by Erasurehead
People must be FORCED to do whats right??
Right according to who?
This is the problem with progressives, they are convinced they are right and everyone else that disagrees must be forced into compliance.
Does individual liberty mean anything to you or should be all be forced to do what YOU think is right?
right according to me meaning the average citizen...
are people memories really this short???
without the government FORCING business to comply with laws, what happened in the past?
we had kids as young as 5 working in mines.. repairing dangerous machines because there hand were smaller, commonly loosing limbs in the process...
thats just one of many examples...
here is another quicky... what happened when factories were polluting rivers with their waste... GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION.. These companies would have never changed their practices by choice... Without the government intervention we would have pollution on par with china...
Does liberty to you mean that you have the right to screw people out of their hard earned money by selling them a lemon of a house, or factories have the right to pollute the world???