It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But what are they denying? That demolition charges were placed in WTC 7? If so, who planted them? CIA?
Originally posted by theability
reply to post by kiwasabi
But what are they denying? That demolition charges were placed in WTC 7? If so, who planted them? CIA?
I had the answer to that question I wouldn't be here.
I just know this, not mentioning WTC 7 is them not being able to explain it, so don't include it, then we don't have to answer for it, in this report.
make sense?
Originally posted by Lasheic
You might be interested in this new video by dprjones in regards to the WTC 7 collapse. I found it rational and fairly interesting, but I know it's cause much rage among some members. You can make of his analysis what you will.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
That, or it ain't THEIR job to go into burning buildings with explosives.
Buildings, I will add, that had been cleared of FFers
1-The FFers believe that 7 will collapse soon.
2-They clear a collapse zone.
3-They put their heads together and decide that it's best to demo the building to prevent colateral damage.
4-They then say F this, we ain't going in there, it might collapse on us.
5-They decide to ignore their training and put civilians into the danger zone.
6-So they decide to send in Controlled Demolitions to do it. (since THEY ain't union)
Originally posted by Reevster
Ummmm I think there is one thing you all seem to be overlooking, and correct me if I am wrong but does it not take days to rig a building with explosives for a demolition ? Seems to me there was only a few hours once the decission was made...so ummm I guess it would have to have been already wired would it not.....
Originally posted by thedman
Only one lying here is YOU for making up nonsense and claimind its the truth!
Originally posted by GenRadek
So let me get this straight.
The demolition teams ran into a building, with explosives, det cords, etc, that was looking like this:
Originally posted by Reevster
Still couldnt change the time it would take to set all the explosives /detonators etc to make it drop like it did , no matter how much of an emergency it was.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by Reevster
Still couldnt change the time it would take to set all the explosives /detonators etc to make it drop like it did , no matter how much of an emergency it was.
For one it does change the time a lot. On a normal demolition they take the time to protect other buildings and so on.
Second, as stated several times, they did not need to set explosives, or if they did they did need a lot of explosives to bring down an already unstable building.
[edit on 9-4-2010 by REMISNE]
Originally posted by REMISNE
For one it does change the time a lot. On a normal demolition they take the time to protect other buildings and so on.
Originally posted by gavron
So, with that statement, you are saying they did not take precautions to protect other buildings. Didn't you say earlier that they were concerned about fires jumping buildings?
So, a fire jumping to a building is more dangerous that a 40+ story building possibly collapsing on it?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
...but I should let people read it at source.
The source again, in case anyone missed it.
Great find, again...and thanks!
Originally posted by REMISNE
They did protect other buildings by bringing the building straight down. If it would have collapsed on its own it would fell towards the side that was damaged and casued more damage to other buildings.