posted on Apr, 1 2010 @ 07:05 AM
it is a random confusion that you do here, of course love is better then hate but love as what to love objectively and hate as what to hate
objectively, what to love objectively is the truth sense beyond all that never end, and what to hate objectively is the nothing certainty sense that
is always a concept of past end
so future end is better then past end, perfect equation prooved being here, what is better is future always so that equation is true absolutely
now the confusion you are making by your means harm the truth, you are suggesting to love what is hateful, in that case hating what is hateful is much
better, because hating what is not a value, bring out the values that justify freedom expressions of its positive source being existing
truth life is always the dimension of nothing absolutely, truth is about futur certainty as living freedom or freedom moves
so we cant either use the concept of love for needs, you are erasing then the truth and puting it under the concept of nothing and its needs
love is superior expression only for what love is a free move out of any needs or existence attachments facts
believing in superiority is the only right belief concept justification
and the principles bases of superiority are clear from any perspective of absolute objective better then itself
now about racism and such issues, it is always hypocrit means that motivate those drives wills and free expressions, they create what is less to say
being more
and it is proven by a lot of powerful organisms in the world
making war to islam is to generalize islam as religion of third world representant and that what israel love to do by deluding the fact of christians
in palestine and sending them out
true kind of racism is what like in europ some immigrations are being ignored to not mix with them but this cannot lead to any war if the logic is
absolutely achieved, it is the hypocrisy that is responsable of frictions, willing to use what you consider less but by meaning to control their
position to be objectively less cannot work
i mean if western civilisation went to do things by itself things would have looked different
what you may consider less you could perceive it more when you are ready for objective free positive sight
i really think that true compassion is the absolute lackness in meaning life by killing
the concept com mean the nothing base as a whole positive certainty source
but it is a passif concept not an active one
saying well to be compassionate you must go and consider what is less to be equal is absurd in all perspective
people should more understand how religions meant to speak to slaves dumb