reply to post by mnemeth1
If you are possitive of the use of nano thermite charges.
1.- How many would be needed to produce what we see??
no idea, i would guess in the hundreds
'Then that would negate it being Nano right? What would be the point? Do you know what Thermite is? Its not C4.'
2.- How would they be placed and where in the building??
most likely by "maintenance" workers, on the supporting columns
'Sure, could be, sounds right. However, if memory serves, the building was supported mostly by its outside framework, not internal columns. So they
would have to place the charges on those, that would be intensely more difficult.'
3.- Why don´t we hear any explosions during the collapse??
when explosives are detonated in very close sequence they produce a "roar" - just listen to the CIWS or A10 shoot once.
'Thats great, if you are claiming an CIWS or A10 brought the building down.'
4.- How could these devices be installed throughout the whole building without being noticed??
'How many? 1, 10, 20? This may sound likely, but it is not. If the workers were not normally from the standard crew, do you not think someone
would have brought it up to security?'
5.- What time do you estimate it would have taken to rig the building with these devices??
long time, several weeks
'Perhaps longer then you think, if it was actually done in secret. It would have to have taken years.'
6.- What kind of technology was used to start them off in secuence??
most likely remote radio detonators
'Not likely. The chances of getting a clear signal during all the Emergency Service Chatter, jammed Cells, HAMS, would literally and did literally
Jam the spectrum. Which brings up another problem, accidental discharge. Even if it was encrypted and coded, you still will have immense difficulty
using radio in that situation. Not at all impossible, but not reliable'
7.- Why didn´t the airplane crash start a chain reaction of all these devices?? (Specialy in the 2nd tower that was hit lower.)
It takes a detonator to set off solid explosives
'Not True! It takes Heat and Pressure to set off solid explosives, all of which were present. Now I know, It depends on the explosive and velocity
of the pressure, however, you cannot make a broad statement like that. You said Thermite. What is the detonating velocity of Thermite? Keep in
mind, Thermite is burning, not exploding.
The whole premise of the OP Video is that because a pixel or two lights up in a shadow, that explosives must have been used. I could also say that
those flecks of light were Alien Space Crafts coming in and out of Hyperspace to bring down the towers. Prove it wrong. This video depends on you
being distracted by the guys commentary. He plants ideas in your head as you are watching and instead of thinking it through, you take what he says
almost immediately because it sounds plausible if your not really paying attention to the details. Now this video also claims to be High Resolution.
Now, how high? Hi def 1080p? What is the definition of High Resolution in this claim? Was it widely available and in use in 2001?
Dont take videos and commentaries on face value. It only took a few minutes to actually process what the guy was saying as balderdash. You had
interesting points, but if you really think the government brought down the towers, why arent you marching on Washington? Why are you paying taxes to
a murderous government? Don't you think this would be TOP priority if you truly believe the government is murdering its own citizens in this