It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Devout muslim women?
Moderate muslims should have no problem with this.
Moderate Mulsim Women?
Devout Muslims should have a problem with this.
You think they won't?
Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to post by intrepid
I like that Quebec is taking a stand against the spread of Islam - but can you not see how this can be spun to make it look as if they are denying Faithful Muslim women the ability to participate in society without going against their faith?
They (devout muslim women) are effectively being given a choice between acting dishonourably and being allowed to interact with beaurucrats/gov't employees, or acting honourable and being denied that ability.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
So what's your take, - do you think this makes Canada look better or worse? (To outsiders)
Is it worth doing (implementing this new requirement), regardless of what negative opinions it conjures?
Originally posted by D.E.M.
It is not racism to expect people who immigrate to your country to integrate with the culture present there. That is called logic.
A Canadian Muslim group is calling on Ottawa to ban the wearing of the burka in public, saying the argument that the right to wear it is protected by the Charter’s guarantee of freedom of religion is false.
"The burka has absolutely no place in Canada," said Farzana Hassan, of the Muslim Canadian Congress. "In Canada we recognize the equality of men and women. We want to recognize gender equality as an absolute. The burka marginalizes women."
She said many women who cover their face in public are being forced to by their husbands and family. As a result, she argued, these women are denied opportunities and cannot live freely as other women in this society.
Originally posted by Duzey
The burka marginalizes women."
Title XLVI
CRIMES Chapter 876
CRIMINAL ANARCHY, TREASON, AND OTHER CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER
876.12: Wearing mask, hood, or other device on public way. -- No person or persons over 16 years of age shall, while wearing any mask, hood, or device whereby any portion of the face is so hidden, concealed, or covered as to conceal the identity of the wearer, enter upon, or be or appear upon any lane, walk, alley, street, road, highway, or other public way in this state.
876.13: Wearing mask, hood, or other device on public property. -- No person or persons shall in this state, while wearing any mask, hood, or device whereby any portion of the face is so hidden, concealed, or covered as to conceal the identity of the wearer, enter upon, or be, or appear upon or within the public property of any municipality or county of the state.
876.14: Wearing mask, hood, or other device on property of another. -- No person or persons over 16 years of age shall, while wearing a mask, hood, or device whereby any portion of the face is so hidden, concealed, or covered as to conceal the identity of the wearer, demand entrance or admission or enter or come upon or into the premises, enclosure, or house of any other person in any municipality or county of this state.
876.15: Wearing mask, hood, or other device at demonstration or meeting. -- No person or persons over 16 years of age, shall, while wearing a mask, hood, or device whereby any portion of the face is so hidden, concealed, or covered as to conceal the identity of the wearer, hold any manner of meeting, make any demonstration upon the private property of another unless such person or persons shall have first obtained from the owner or occupier of the property his or her written permission to so do.
876.155: Applicability; ss. 876.12-876.15. -- The provisions of ss. 876.12-876.15 apply only if the person was wearing the mask, hood, or other device:
(1) With the intent to deprive any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws or for the purpose of preventing the constituted authorities of this state or any subdivision thereof from, or hindering them in, giving or securing to all persons within this state the equal protection of the laws;
(2) With the intent, by force or threat of force, to injure, intimidate, or interfere with any person because of the person's exercise of any right secured by federal, state, or local law or to intimidate such person or any other person or any class of persons from exercising any right secured by federal, state, or local law;
(3) With the intent to intimidate, threaten, abuse, or harass any other person; or
(4) While she or he was engaged in conduct that could reasonably lead to the institution of a civil or criminal proceeding against her or him, with the intent of avoiding identification in such a proceeding.
876.16: Sections 876.11-876.15; exemptions. -- The following persons are exempted from the provisions of ss. 876.11-876.15:
(1) Any person or persons wearing traditional holiday costumes;
(2) Any person or persons engaged in trades and employment where a mask is worn for the purpose of ensuring the physical safety of the wearer, or because of the nature of the occupation, trade, or profession;
(3) Any person or persons using masks in theatrical productions, including use in Gasparilla celebrations and masquerade balls;
(4) Persons wearing gas masks prescribed in emergency management drills and exercises.
Man charged with wearing a clown mask in public
By JOSH POLTILOVE
Published: February 25, 2010
TAMPA - Send in the clowns. Then the police.
A teen wearing a clown mask with bright red-orange hair was arrested Tuesday, charged with the rarely reported offense of wearing a mask or hood on a public road and the more common crime of obstructing or resisting an officer without violence.
About 1:10 p.m. Tuesday, a deputy spotted the clown-masked man, later identified as Matthew Lopez, and at least one other person walking south on 58th Street North, a Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office report said.
They headed west through a wooded path near the rear of open offices. A deputy tailed them until a marked Temple Terrace police unit arrived. When the deputy tried to make contact, Lopez and another person ran, an arrest report states.
They were found near 58th Street and 122nd Avenue East.
It's not clear why Lopez, who turned 19 Wednesday, was wearing a mask, sheriff's spokeswoman Debbie Carter said. Lopez was charged with two misdemeanors and has been released on $750 bail.
He couldn't be reached for comment Wednesday.
A juvenile, who has not been named, also was charged with a misdemeanor.
This is not the first time a person has been charged with wearing a mask in public, although it's "pretty uncommon," Carter said.
The charge is based on a 1951 law designed to combat the Ku Klux Klan, part of the section of Florida statutes dealing with criminal anarchy and treason.
In October 2008, Tampa police arrested Walsh Ian Nichols after he was spotted wearing a Batman mask in Ybor City.
A judge dismissed the charges against the Caped Crusader and ordered police to return Nichols' custom-made cowl.
Originally posted by Wyn Hawks
...about the current deal affecting women who wear a burqa or a veil - not only is this ruling racist, its ignorant, sexist and culturally / religiously intolerant...
Originally posted by K J Gunderson
ISLAM IS NOT A RACE.
Religion is NOT YOUR RACE.
There is no MUSLIM RACE.
Originally posted by Wyn Hawks
...about the current deal affecting women who wear a burqa or a veil - not only is this ruling racist, its ignorant, sexist and culturally / religiously intolerant...
Originally posted by K J Gunderson
There is no moderate Muslim race.
There is no devout Muslim race.
Originally posted by K J Gunderson
Whatever people think about this, racism has NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.
Originally posted by Wyn Hawks
...it mostly certainly is racism when its coming from the descendants of white immigrants who came over here and not only refused to integrate with the cultures that were already present but went out of their way to annihilate the cultures that were already present...
Originally posted by Wyn Hawks
...i'll clarify, since you're having a hard time with such a complex sentence... the bare face law is racist... the bare face law is ignorant... the bare face law is sexist... the bare face law is culturally intolerant... the bare face law is religiously intolerant...
Originally posted by Wyn Hawks
...some of your cylinders aint firin'...
...i stated the reason why THIS IS A RACIAL ISSUE in my first paragraph of my first post on this thread, which you obviously failed to comprehend - so - i'll repost it for your convenience and i suggest you read it again S-L-O-W-L-Y...
Originally posted by Wyn Hawks
...it mostly certainly is racism when its coming from the descendants of white immigrants who came over here and not only refused to integrate with the cultures that were already present but went out of their way to annihilate the cultures that were already present...