It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by okbmd
Simply put : Do you feel that the current judicial system that we have in place in the United States is fair and adequate ?
When a person or group of persons is suspected of committing a crime, do you believe that the person(s) should be brought before a court to answer to said crime(s) ?
Or do you believe that the person(s) should be allowed to select a group of individuals, of their choosing,to conduct an investigation to ascertain whether or not the crime(s) warrant further investigation ?
Now, if those person(s) were suspected of being the one(s) responsible for killing your family members, which set of procedures would you want to see applied ?
If you chose the private investigation scenario,then what if those investigators stated that they were not allowed to do a thorough and impartial investigation ?
Would this cause you to cry foul, or would you simply accept it and move on ?
Now let's suppose that the criminal(s) were brought before the court instead. Would you want to see those suspected of murdering your family tried with ALL of the available evidence, or would you rather see them tried with only the 'evidence' that THEY have supplied.,evidence that,when held up to scrutiny,carries no weight in this court of law ?
Would you feel that justice is served by letting them point the finger at someone else,although they have absolutely nothing that can prove this ?
Would you want the court to allow you to introduce the volumes of what you consider to be evidence that could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the suspect(s) were indeed somewhat complicit in the murder of your family ? Or, would you just turn and walk away ?
Be honest with yourself on this. Which course of procedure would you favor ?
The right way,or the wrong way ?
The defense has not proven to me that Osama bin Ladin had anything to do with murdering your family.
But I, and so many others, have mountains of evidence that would prove to you who did it. And still,you refuse to acknowledge that we have the right to bring the real perpetrators to justice.
Those were your fellow Americans who were murdered that day. Those people were part of your family. IF you have any sense of National Pride at all, that is. To deny those poor souls justice is MOST SHAMEFUL on your part. It is a DISGRACE.
But,we will get JUSTICE. With or without you.
Originally posted by okbmd
reply to post by hooper
So then, you consider the pursuit of justice to be a threat ?
This speaks volumes as to your character.
There can never be justice as long as those of us who are true to our morals and convictions step aside and let those of your ilk dictate to us what is true or not true.
As i've said, Justice will prevail, with or without YOU.
Originally posted by rev. richard
reply to post by Alfie1
As an analyst, I reviewed hours of footage, documents, speeches etc, to ease the minds of conspiracy theorists. Unfortunately, I was unable to. The biggest people we have in America is those who take words of others at face value. Dig deep enough, the facts speak for themselves.
We have equal access to the Courts, except pertaining to 9-11, or other "proven" theories. Setting aside the conspiracies, get a book entitled, "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder." Lawyer and author Vincent Bugliosi is laying his reputation on the line for truth and justice. He, as an assistant prosecutor convicted Charles Manson and six other for murdering Sharon Tate and her family in 1969. He's prosecuted 106 felonies, with 1 loss, including winning 22 out of 22 murder cases.
Read the book, then ask yourself: If our courts won't accept a case that is signed, sealed, and delivered on a silver platter, WHY?
Originally posted by rev. richard
reply to post by Alfie1
We have equal access to the Courts,
except pertaining to 9-11, or other "proven" theories.
Setting aside the conspiracies, get a book entitled, "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder." Lawyer and author Vincent Bugliosi is laying his reputation on the line for truth and justice. He, as an assistant prosecutor convicted Charles Manson and six other for murdering Sharon Tate and her family in 1969. He's prosecuted 106 felonies, with 1 loss, including winning 22 out of 22 murder cases.
Read the book, then ask yourself: If our courts won't accept a case that is signed, sealed, and delivered on a silver platter, WHY?
Originally posted by okbmd
reply to post by hooper
"Your threat is quite obvious." Again, do you feel threatened by the fact that there are those of us who wish to see an independent investigation conducted by a committee of representatives that we the people have chosen? Your infatuation with the word 'threat' is only an attempt on your part to 'bait' me.Give it up dude, you will never get me to go there. Find someone else to play with.
And if you can't get this "committee of represnetatives" to convene on your command will you still be seeking your own brand of justice?
Are you arguing for me,or against me here?!! Because you made my case for me in that last quote. Maybe you have been asleep for the last several years,so here's the deal...The overwhelming majority of American 'society' rejects the official 9/11 story.
Whatever makes you happy. If that is what you want to believe then I kind of know better than try to dissuade you. But as a matter of record, no I have not been sleeping for the last several years. I have been wide awake, I participate in politics, I read and by virtue of my job, interact with a large cross section of the American population. My view point is my own, but from where I stand, once this computer is shut off pretty much the issue disappears until some nutjob with a gun makes the evening news.
At least 1/3 of that same 'society' believes that the government had foreknowledge and was complicit or 'allowed' it to happen. And by the way, your cherished MSM conducted these polls.
Yeah, you better check those numbers again.
So, let me emphasize that. I am not alone in my pursuit of justice. The majority of Americans agree with me.
Yeah, you pretty much are alone. There are a few more of you out there, but not many. Not enough to make even a ripple in the political pond by conventional means. This is why when you use language like "justice with or without you" it takes on a whole new meaning.
So, maybe your perceived 'threat' is very much larger than you realize.
Oh I think it is real, but for much different reasons. It wouldn't be the first time in history that a political microrganism, frustrated with a lack of attention, took extraordinary steps to garnish attraction and foment imaginary revolutions. See T. McVeigh and Oklahoma City.