Well I think it has several things going for it. One is that the guys appear to be ignorant about actually thinking the one who raised his hand had
touched the UFO.
That's a good sign in my opinion. I think they were pretty far back, but hey a hoaxer would say yeah I definitely touched and saw something.
Second, I myself have witnessed the ability of these UFO's to CLOAK so to speak. You can still make out the forms from a distance especially when
they are low and the heat is radiating around them. When they get higher towards the cooler temps the cloak takes full effect and they disappear.
That explains why the closer observer could not see the craft while the further one still could because of the heat signature being disturbed around
it even though it had cloaked.
When I studied the images a year ago when they first came out, I concluded the object was FAR away from the top of the hill the guy was standing on.
You can tell when the object descends and it passes the horizon.
Now that I can see the video, it looks to me that there is distortion caused by air turbulence, and also a very large haze, and the amount of zoom
needed to view this object also tells me the object is outside of the depth of field of the camera (to far away). So it is nowhere near the guy in the
field, and completely out of focus.
This object looks EXACTLY like the last few minutes of an aircraft landing. A similar event happened not to long ago, and it turned out to be right
next to an airport. View this video from 0:41 and after, and you will see a similar out of focus object, descending at a similar speed.
As you can see they two objects look very similar.
Even if there is an airport near by or not, that area is prone to many aircraft for various reasons;
A: Crop duster aircraft, to spray the crops.
B: Ultra light aircraft. Wiltshire is known to have ultralight enthusiasts. They actually get a huge profit from tourists that want to see crop
circles from a birds eye view.
C: Hot-air balloons. That area hosts a lot of hot air balloon events.
D: Common aircraft. There is so much land out there that a lot of farmers have their own personal aircraft and airfields.
I really want to lean towards B. The amount of time the object was sitting in the air means it was probably a really slow aircraft like an ultralight
flying towards or away from the camera over a long distance making the illusion that it is hovering.
That's a good video except you are ignoring simple logic
The object was filmed for an hour straight, and I know of 0 planes that can stay in the same area for that long while waiting to land.
I'm not saying it's a verifiable UFO, but it is an intriguing video in light of all the UFO's I have witnessed to include a massive cloaked UFO
ascending and as it went from the lower altitude to higher it disappeared as the air got cooler and no longer outlined the crafts outer form.
After approx. 15 minutes or so the craft descends out of sight for another 10 minutes or so. At this stage we thought that this was the end of the
sighting. So Paul switched off his camera to preserve battery life while I drove towards the field where the craft was spotted.
They were watching it take off and land for an hour, not fly for an hour straight.
No the guy with the camera would have been better if he walk towards it and kept recording, looks like he had a decent camera for a change but video
just backs up whats others say about it being most likely a mirage.
The guy in the field couldn't see it and he could still see it and the heat shimmer is very clear to see on the video.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.