reply to post by InterdimensionalWarrior
Well then, really what you are saying is that there are instances where there are emotive terminologies and visuals that cause dis-ease or anxiety and
as such provoke a specific reaction. Let's use the term "terrorist" or "terror" as an example as it has been used prolifically in post 9/11.
Such a term instills a specific pathway and certain reaction - as the intent of the term is to rally agreement to the one using it.
In that sense, a fnord can be anything...and is very unlikely a literal usage of the term "fnord".
As such, I pretty much stand by my previous post in this thread...which by the way, is a huge blast from the past. I can't believe that this was
brought back up...